Originally posted by ChristianRock Rumor has it that this lens is so good, that Mr. Masakazu Saori designed the DA 70 Limited based on that design.
I read about the lens serving as "inspiration" for the 70mm... Like you say, rumors.
I will say one thing - this lens is "heavy"; it is unlike the other 110 lenses I have (the 50mm and the 24mm). The 70/2.8 is metal, smooth, like a work of art. Focal depth goes from 5ft minimum to 80 feet prior to hitting infinity. Subjects pop into foucs; yet the depth of field is slim since it shoots wide open (again, while some people manage to make an aperture for the lens, I am not going for that, I'll use it as designed).
It is a true beauty.
---------- Post added 09-21-21 at 07:23 PM ----------
Originally posted by pepperberry farm maybe you need more time to let the lens work its way into your psyche....
Originally posted by ChristianRock I have to give this lens a bit more effort, and use it with my newer cameras as well, to see what I get from it.
Dave is right... this is one of those lenses that when I got my first copy I was so hyped by everything I read that I thought I could just point and shoot chefs-d'uvre with every single click.
It was dissapointing at first until I learnt its weaknesses and highlights. I can tell you, at infinity for shooting buildings and cityscapes, the Macro-Tak (preset) 50/4 blows away the A 50/2.8 on my book...
The A does great in lanscapes. For me the most detailed/sharp/colours/flowers macro (in macro mode or product shooting) is the K 50/4.
IDK, everyone's opinion will differ... one good thing about the A 50/2.8 is that it is better than average, close to stellar, in every kind of situation... not so slow at 2.8 (for a macro it is fast), it is a desert island lens, as it is very complete. You just gotta find your groove with it.
---------- Post added 09-21-21 at 08:12 PM ----------
Rikenon XR 50/1.4