Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
06-07-2008, 05:57 PM   #1
Veteran Member




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: nyc
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 564
Help me decide...

I am on the fence about a new purchase...LBA is begging me to buy something, and damn Pentax has to release a bunch of new glass to help cloud the mind....

Right now I am trying to decide between adding the 55-300, or waiting for the 60-250, or possibly going for the 18-250 again.


Here's my reasoning for each:
-55-300....the rave reviews kinda sell this lens really easily. the images are great. And I yearn for some more reach beyond 200mm, which is my longest lens currently.

-60-250....its a nice star lens, but without knowing when it ships or how good it willl be....plus being 50 shorter, overlaping my other star lens (and slower)....i find it easier to talk myself out of this one. price and size are not in its favor

-the 18-250, i am really only including for 2 reasons--it reduces the size of the kit, and its just a bit more expensive than the 55-300. yes, i'd sacrifice 50mm, but I'd have to ask myself how much I'd miss what I don't already have....

the almost all-in-one would be ideal for my family vacation. with all the gear the kids are going to need, daddy can't bring his usual photography gear.

expanding on that....anyone who has the 50-135 AND the 55-300....how would you feel if, for a week, you had to use just the 55-300....would you be OK with that? I mean, I know the quality of the star lens first hand...but for anyone who has shot both....are you happy enough with the output from the 55-300 that you wouldn't be kicking yourself for leaving the bulkier lens home? Just thinking I could have a kit of :
16-45, 55-300, and probably one of my wide angles...if not both, since they aren't massive. the 40 and 50 could sneak their way in, as small as they are....

just trying to get some ideas.....

06-07-2008, 06:12 PM   #2
Forum Member




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 74
Don't forget the good FA 80-320mm lens also!!!
06-07-2008, 06:13 PM   #3
Inactive Account




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Niagara, Wisconsin U.S. of Ay.
Posts: 394
Just to answer you latter question. I really only use my 50-135 for indoor sporting events and fall night time football games under the lights. The rest of the time I use my "cheap" lenses. I HATE the fact that I had to pay so much for the 50-135 for such a limited use. If all I did was landscape and mostly still photography, I would have never bought it. Other than being a 2.8, I find nothing great about it....nothing.
06-07-2008, 06:15 PM   #4
Inactive Account




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Niagara, Wisconsin U.S. of Ay.
Posts: 394
Go for a 28-300. Cost effective.

Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
gear, k-mount, kit, lens, pentax lens, size, slr lens, star
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help me decide! NicK10D Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 4 07-19-2010 10:54 AM
help me decide... jmdeegan Pentax DSLR Discussion 4 05-12-2010 08:55 AM
Help me decide Pentax Bob Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 7 04-03-2010 06:01 PM
Trying to decide xs400 Monthly Photo Contests 0 07-01-2009 11:40 AM
Help me decide? jmdeegan Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 9 03-11-2008 08:31 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:33 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top