lens for K-50 (I want your opinion)

sterretje · 05-21-2015, 04:16 AM

Keep it at the cheap side. Invest the extra money in a flash and a tripod (my personal order of priorities); both are accessories that are not cheap (usually, you get what you pay for).

Personally I consider the WR a second line of defense; common sense and, if needed, a lens coat or plastic bag will also do. With that in mind, I would consider the Sigma 17-70 Contemporary (currently $400) as well. Actually, it would be what I would buy if I would start out today with a Pentax camera and a standard zoom.

From the review here (Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 Contemporary Review - Conclusion | PentaxForums.com Reviews

Quote:

We'll get straight to the point and say that if we were limited to having only one walkaround lens, this would be the one. While it does not offer quite as much reach as the Pentax 18-135mm, we prefer it for is versatility (faster aperture and macro capabilities) and improved image quality. If only it were weather-sealed, it would be the perfect lens! If this lens is indicative of the quality and performance of other lenses in Sigma's new lineup, then the Pentax community will surely be in for a treat.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Wanted - Acquired: Buying a K-S2? I'll take your 18-50 kit lens	bdery	Sold Items	17	04-14-2015 09:32 AM
Walkaround lens (lenses) for K-50, what are your thoughts, please?	bladerunner6	Troubleshooting and Beginner Help	30	01-02-2015 08:47 AM
I come from the K-5 and i want to set K-50... help	Michi Joel	Pentax K-30 & K-50	13	12-06-2014 04:55 PM
Urgent request for second opinion- buy k-500 or k-50	Midnit_kos86	Troubleshooting and Beginner Help	18	02-22-2014 08:52 PM
I need your opinion... K-x or a lightly used K200D?	theperception2008	Pentax DSLR Discussion	26	05-01-2010 08:57 AM

05-21-2015, 04:16 AM	#16
sterretje Veteran Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Roodepoort, South Africa Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 3,561	Keep it at the cheap side. Invest the extra money in a flash and a tripod (my personal order of priorities); both are accessories that are not cheap (usually, you get what you pay for). Personally I consider the WR a second line of defense; common sense and, if needed, a lens coat or plastic bag will also do. With that in mind, I would consider the Sigma 17-70 Contemporary (currently $400) as well. Actually, it would be what I would buy if I would start out today with a Pentax camera and a standard zoom. From the review here (Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 Contemporary Review - Conclusion \| PentaxForums.com Reviews Quote: We'll get straight to the point and say that if we were limited to having only one walkaround lens, this would be the one. While it does not offer quite as much reach as the Pentax 18-135mm, we prefer it for is versatility (faster aperture and macro capabilities) and improved image quality. If only it were weather-sealed, it would be the perfect lens! If this lens is indicative of the quality and performance of other lenses in Sigma's new lineup, then the Pentax community will surely be in for a treat.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
	Search this Thread: Advanced Search