Quote: FF has lower noise than smaller sensors, when viewing at equal resolution, or when printing to the same size.
You said it, not me. You quoted a stat that doesn't equalize for DoF. When viewing at the same size and resolution and DOF, FF has no noise advantage, because it has to give up it's one stop of noise advantage, to shoot with a one stop higher ISO and one stop smaller aperture, to equalize DoF IN that case the smaller sensor, is utilizing twice the light on half the sensor size, the light, total light utilized in creating the image is the same, noise should be the same. Look at the examples above, there is no noise advantage to the larger sensor. Did you even look at the examples? How can you keep saying that, in the presence of real world evidence to the contrary?
Quote: So let's break clean. There is no such thing as equivalent to 35mm focal length, just like there is no equivalent 645 , 6x7, 4x5 or 8x10 focal length for any criteria
Exactly, stop proclaiming "this format is better than that format," for what ever reason, and go shoot some pictures. If you can't prove your point with a few images, you don't have a point. Quit spouting the photo-blog rhetoric. It's sickening.
If someone wanted to post a couple images, one with FF and one with APS_c and discuss their expeience with those images, that would be totally fascinating. This endless parade of people regurgitating web losers whacked out theories has got to stop. Half these dudes are out of their freakin minds. I don't raed them because it hurts me to have to experience such ignorance. Having people post their hogwash on here just sucks. If you think they're so great, go post on their web site. Leave us alone.
Last edited by normhead; 07-13-2015 at 01:05 PM.