Originally posted by cxdoo My impression is that any object spanning a significant portion of the frame will be distorted. If that's the goal it's very easy to achieve it.
Personally I find the distortion slightly nauseous.
To me if you want a successfull photo with an UWA or a fish eyes you should not use it to put more in the photo but because you are after the distorsion effect and want to use it creatively. That's why the cars shoot of fs999 are great as well 2 portraits with the dogs of Sandy.
If you don't want the distorsion or you just want to put more in the frame because you are quite likely to get a photo that doesn't please you or that is quite boring.
In this case you may be better off with a moderate WA, let say in the 20-28mm range on APSC.
The architecture shoots you show us could be taken with a tele or at least with a normal lense and would avoid such extreme distorsion. They would likely look better if you are not after the effect and used the UWA just to get more in the frame... But this might mean you need to say be at the windows on the opposite building to be far enough from the subject. And that's not always feasible/easy.