Originally posted by Paul the Sunman I have the opposite problem. With the 18-135 in my bag, I find it too easy to leave it on most of the time and not give my primes their rightful share. It's at its best on bright sunny blue-sky days -- I guess you get plenty of those in Finland.
True, the lens is stella when the conditions are good. The problem with having a full time desk job is that I am inside on weekdays.
Even with the little light that we have during winter i spend it inside at work.
---------- Post added 11-09-15 at 14:49 ----------
Originally posted by Sandy Hancock You have answered your own original question. You need the DA18-135WR. You have other lenses for low light and the very wide.
I know, right? But it seems like the solution is so easy a choice.
---------- Post added 11-09-15 at 15:10 ----------
Originally posted by VoiceOfReason Even with what I have I still use mine. I'd say get rid of the 70-300 and M 50 and get a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 or for weather sealing the Pentax 16-50 f/2.8, or for better low light the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8.
The 70-300 i will say has given me a lot of good shots when I have been using it for taking portraits. Better than the 18-135 at low light.
For the extra reach and the fact that I will not get much from it if I get rid of it I think it will be good to keep it.
For the same reason of keeping a cheap but good and fast lens I will like to keep the M50 should the F50 fail.
Is this how LBAs justify their purchases?