I think the choice is between the Pentax 16-85 and the Sigma 17-50. While I realise that a lot of Pentaxians love their 18-135, and it is versatile and weather resistant, there is just too much agreement across virtually all reviews I've read on the lens being pretty mediocre optically. When PF calls the corners
"terribly soft" and Photozone adds a note saying
"Just to mention again - we couldn't believe the rather poor performance so we asked the local Pentax service in Hamburg/Germany for an assessment of the situation. Result: the lens is within factory specifications.", I am just not comfortable with shelling out a couple of hundred € on it
Until recently my brain said
"Sigma!" while my heart whispered
"Pentax ...", but the more I read about the Sigma, the more it appears to be a great alternative. Sure, I'd lose a bit of range and weather sealing, but the vast majority of PF members having reviewed this lens seem to consider its optical performance nothing short of spectacular. Very sharp in the image centre and decently sharp into the corners wide open at 17 mm, and razor sharp across the frame upon stopping down by just one to two stops ...
Argh, the choice is not getting easier. But I will stop bothering you folks with my undecidedness. I think I now have all the information I need, so thanks everyone for a lot of great and really helpful advise!