Originally posted by Kathleyne Is anyone using the Sigma 50-500? What can you tell me. I have read many reviews and other than the weight, it seems to be a good lens.Thanks! Kathy
Used a 50~500 for years until the Pentax 150~450 came out, then I let it go to another Pentaxian. Things about it (IMHO): 1) very good up to about 350mm, a bit soft at the long end; 2) actual maximum FL is closer to 450mm than 500mm (=about 10% exaggeration by SIgma); 3) if you fill the frame (=no cropping) images taken @ max FL are fine, especially if you stop down to f8~11; 4) it is heavy (what can be expected of a lens that is longer than 400mm?), but fairly compact when not zoomed out, so not too much problem for transport (used my on an African tour - no problem).; 5) happier on a tripod than hand held (both the lens and you).
Both the 50~500 and less commonly the 150~500 can be had at good prices second hand.
Other long lenses available used only: 1) SMCA 400mm f5.6 (best stopped down to f8~11; 2) Tamron 400mm f4 (an excellent 400mm despite the age of the design, there was one on offer in the PF MARKETPLACE at least up to a few days back).
Another alternative: Very clean examples of the Nikon 600mm f5.6 are available on EBAY for competitive prices. IF you are doing wildlife, especially small birds, you will not need to focus to infinity, so this lens could be mounted on a Pentax body using a no-lens Nikon-to-Pentax adapter available on EBAY. I don't know what the greatest focus distance would be with this adapter, but I suspect it would be at least 75 yards/meters, much farther away than is practical for bird photography.