Originally posted by Rondec It shouldn't squeak. My DA *55 makes a very faint, high pitched whistle when it focuses that you have to have decent high frequency hearing to hear, but none of my SDM lenses squeak. I would get another one. This is one of those lenses that doesn't seem to have a lot of copy variation with regard to optics, so I think you'll be fine, Ed.
So hard to describe in words... It's a lot like you describe. A very faint high frequency "chirp/whistle." It only does it when it's starting to move the elements not while they are moving. And then any time it stops and fine tunes the focus. Then each time it starts it chirps chiprs chirps. But it's very faint. It's got to be a quiet room to hear it. I almost think it may be normal, I'm just being ultra careful!
---------- Post added 12-18-15 at 02:47 PM ----------
Originally posted by Madaboutpix Squeaky noises certainly don't inspire trust in a lens purchase. If it is something not only lemmon lenses do but a behaviour exhibited even by (some?) perfect copies, until they have seen some use or had a chance to recharge their capacitor on camera, I wish Ricoh would mention this tendency in the operating manual or some technical advisory. Being silent about this sort of thing leaves people in doubt and risks making them paranoid. In particular, given the reputation Pentax SDM has developed since it was introduced.
I'd sure love to have lenses like the DA*200 and DA*300 in my kit, as they seem to be optically sublime, but you spend serious money on them, and then I expect gear that lasts me a little longer. Even if it's mainly a head problem, the uneasy feeling remains ...
Yea, any other lens and I'd ignore this completely. Paranoia for sure!!
---------- Post added 12-18-15 at 02:50 PM ----------
Originally posted by A_Delorme Do you miss the range of the Tamron 70-200? Are the colors better with the 50-135?
It's so bad to see all those discounts while getting paid in Canadian dollars. 1 US$ = 1,38 CND $... Glad I bought my K-5 IIs in 2013 while the dollar was almost at pair...
The weight of the 70-200 was a serious consideration. I seem to be getting much more use out of the 50-135 with the HD 55-300 to cover the 135-200+ bit. But I don't shoot any kind of sports, just landscape and wedding work. If there were any sports shooting in the mix the 70-200 would be the one.
The IQ of the 50-135 is better particularly the colors, but the Tamron isn't bad and totally usable professionally.