Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
01-02-2016, 02:23 PM   #16
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Working From Home
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 26,276
QuoteOriginally posted by blende8 Quote
The problem I see here is, if I understand you correctly, that the lenses are not entirely the same.
The main problem is that the M42 lenses have a smaller diameter, so it is not so easy to add a K-mount to such a lens.

Below is a comparison of the SMC 105/2.8 M42 lens with the same lens in K-mount:
The lens BARRELS are identical, as is the formula. The coatings and focus rings only were updated for the K version. Even the lens caps on the K-mount are metal dinner plates, same as every Takumar lens.

These lenses were designed with a detachable part at the end - a mount tube. The mount tube is a piece of anodized metal maybe 2.5 or 3 inches long that is removable. It attaches directly behind the aperture ring and was intended to be transferred from one long lens to another as an economizing measure. It was then a simple matter to change only the mount tube from M42 to K-mount. You could update a Takumar 500/4.5 to K-mount (SMC Pentax 1:4.5/500) by simply buying a replacement tube - but they are all gone.


Last edited by monochrome; 01-02-2016 at 02:32 PM.
01-02-2016, 06:55 PM   #17
Pentaxian




Join Date: Mar 2015
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,381
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
The lens BARRELS are identical, as is the formula. The coatings and focus rings only were updated for the K version. Even the lens caps on the K-mount are metal dinner plates, same as every Takumar lens.

These lenses were designed with a detachable part at the end - a mount tube. The mount tube is a piece of anodized metal maybe 2.5 or 3 inches long that is removable. It attaches directly behind the aperture ring and was intended to be transferred from one long lens to another as an economizing measure. It was then a simple matter to change only the mount tube from M42 to K-mount. You could update a Takumar 500/4.5 to K-mount (SMC Pentax 1:4.5/500) by simply buying a replacement tube - but they are all gone.
Looks like Pentax took some hints from Tamron...
01-03-2016, 12:03 AM   #18
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2011
Photos: Albums
Posts: 8,758
More like they were planning transition to K for a long time, or it was a manufacturing and support efficiency measure.

Which lenses have this common part?
01-03-2016, 01:30 AM   #19
Veteran Member
blende8's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bremen, Germany
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,521
I have three lenses where I can make a direct comparison:
A 105/2.8
B 120/2.8
C 135/2.5

I measured directly behind the aperture ring:

Takumars:
A 5,60 cm
B 5,60 cm
C 6,50 cm

K-mount:
A 5,85 cm
B 5,85 cm
C 6,60 cm

Measured with a caliper.

Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
adapter, adapter attachment, attachment, drill, holes, idea, k-mount, lens, m42-k mount adapter, pentax lens, piece, slr lens

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trouble Mounting an M42 lens via an M42-K Adapter onto K-mount Bodies fwcetus Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 9 09-19-2015 02:51 PM
For Sale - Sold: M42 to K mount adapter ClinchShots Sold Items 2 03-16-2014 01:51 PM
Genuine Pentax Mount Adapter B or M42 To K adapter SANDY1977 Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 9 06-22-2013 02:41 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:29 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top