Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
07-01-2008, 05:05 PM   #1
Inactive Account




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 478
Sigma 50 1.4 is looking to be amazing

Sigma 50mm: Marmite Bokeh - FM Forums

Sounds promising to me.


Wide open at 1.4


100% crop


07-01-2008, 05:50 PM   #2
Veteran Member
creampuff's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Singapore
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,955
Was this picture taken by you? Picture was shot using a Canon 20D...
The CA is pretty noticeable.
07-01-2008, 06:07 PM   #3
Veteran Member




Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,915
i was looking at Canon forums prior and the wide open performance seemed pretty good. nice of Sigma to step up and use some newer designs in a 50, especially considering all the major manufacturers haven't changed the "formula" for decades.
from the link, the bokeh imo looks very smooth, although someone else there mentioned terrible

Last edited by k100d; 07-01-2008 at 06:14 PM.
07-01-2008, 07:25 PM   #4
Veteran Member
heatherslightbox's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Gainesville, FL
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,595
Apparently, Adorama is already taking preorders for it in the Pentax mount.
310109 Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Auto Focus Lens for Pentax AF Cameras (*Auto Focus only if body supports HSM)
The price is steeper than I thought it would be, especially considering that the Pentax FA50/1.4 is less than half the price brand new. Granted, it doesn't have HSM, but to me HSM isn't worth an extra $300. For a 50mm lens, this thing is a monster, weighing in at 18.3 oz. and taking a 77mm filter.

For the record, I just picked up an A50/1.7 off of Fleabay shipped for $74.50. This should keep me satisfied until the DA*55/1.4 comes out. Even if it runs about the same price as the Sigma, it would have weather sealing and I would assume that it would be smaller.

Heather

07-01-2008, 07:36 PM   #5
Veteran Member
Jodokast96's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Erial, NJ USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,132
QuoteOriginally posted by hwblanks Quote
The price is steeper than I thought it would be, especially considering that the Pentax FA50/1.4 is less than half the price brand new. Granted, it doesn't have HSM, but to me HSM isn't worth an extra $300.
Especially since the FA 50 is a pretty quiet focusing lense to begin with.
07-01-2008, 08:08 PM   #6
Veteran Member
morfic's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 428
At that price tag i'd rather get a ZK 50/1.4 or hold out for a DA* 55/1.4
07-01-2008, 08:22 PM   #7
Veteran Member




Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,915
it is also a relatively large lens w/ a 77mm thread
07-01-2008, 09:12 PM   #8
Inactive Account




Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 942
*shrug*. Gonna take more than those pics to show why (as others have mentioned) I'd rather have this than 1 of many less expensive (and higher pedigree) 50s available to K-mount.

On a positive note, they beat Pentax to an SDM style lens in this catagory, though I doubt its enough to make the K-mount version of this lens wildly successful.

50s I'd rather have at the price:

1) 58/1.4 Voigtlander Nokton $379
2) 50/1.4 Zeiss Planar $499
3) 50/1.2 Pentax $var, approx $450
4) 50/1.4 Super Tak $75
5) 50/55/1.2 Porst/Revuenon (Cosina) $250+

FWIW, I'll gladly see how it looks, but it'll have a lot of competition unless HSM has been on everyones wish list.

07-02-2008, 12:17 AM   #9
Veteran Member




Join Date: Sep 2006
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,713
If Sigma hands me over one I'll use it on my Sigma body, however for now I'm happy using my Super Tak on both my systems

In my opinion the only thing that I'm missing is AF, which I can live without
I should say that my copy appears to be sharper than some at f1.4 making the decision easier.
07-02-2008, 12:40 AM   #10
Veteran Member
gkopeliadis's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ATHENS, GREECE
Posts: 311
QuoteOriginally posted by Tyler Quote
I don't know ... To much CA for my taste!
07-02-2008, 07:53 AM   #11
Veteran Member
Miserere's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,994
The Sigma might be larger because it probably focusses closer than the FA 50mm.

In any case, I think people on this forum tend to forget that one thing that has characterised Pentax for a long time is the production of small lenses, especially primes, without sacrificing image quality. Just compare the FA* 24mm f/2 to the Sigma 24mm f/1.8. For this reason, I'm really hoping Pentax announce a fast 24mm before I buy the Sigma.

As for the 50mm, I'm keeping my FA. Sigma would have to pry it from my cold, dead hands
07-02-2008, 08:06 AM   #12
Inactive Account




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Brisbane, QLD, AUS
Posts: 3,262
QuoteOriginally posted by creampuff Quote
The CA is pretty noticeable.
It's a Sigma...

07-02-2008, 09:36 AM   #13
Inactive Account




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, San Diego, Seattle
Posts: 456
I'm assuming the DA*55 will be at least $500 or more
07-02-2008, 09:46 AM   #14
Inactive Account




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Outside of Philly
Posts: 1,564
This lens is attractive to Nikon users because it will actually autofocus on the D40/D60 bodies. It is attractive to Canon users because the Canon 50mm f/1.4 doesn't have true ring-USM and can be fairly soft wide-open.

Pentax already has the excellent FA 50mm f/1.4 which autofocuses on ALL Pentax bodies and is a decent performer wide open.
07-02-2008, 10:18 AM   #15
RaduA
Guest




Suposedly the new Sigma is optimised for better performance in resolution and contrast from the wide open onwards. From the photozone MTF graphs Pentax FA 50 is pretty soft until f2.0 and becomes good @ 2.8. The Zeiss and Nokton 58 are kind of a stop better (what P has @ 2.8 those 2 have @ f2) and more even across the center and borders.

I saw (and done) pics with FA 50 @ 1.4 - 2 and some are usable but all Pentax designs (including A and K50/1.2) lack contrast and sharpness in corners pretty bad at this range. Anyway one must take into acount the very thin DOF after all at this apertures.

I personaly will wait for DA* 55 and compare it with Sigma but right from the start a major difference is that Sigma it's FF and Pentax not. Besides I kind of like the gold band.

Radu
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
k-mount, pentax lens, sigma, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amazing Work Taff Photographic Technique 3 11-28-2009 02:19 AM
Don't know how they do this but its amazing NaClH2O Digital Processing, Software, and Printing 9 11-07-2009 07:53 PM
Got my new lens :] Amazing, but STIFF! [Sigma] PNTXFTW12 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 3 12-12-2008 04:22 PM
It is amazing what one can do... Cideway Pentax DSLR Discussion 3 04-14-2007 07:58 AM
Amazing what you see when you look up! photo_mom Post Your Photos! 18 03-29-2007 07:56 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:06 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top