About 12 months ago I made a reality check on my lens collection and decided that although I had some nice and interesting glass, I didn't use them sufficiently to warrant keeping them, I also decided that I needed to analyse my shooting requirements and buy or replace accordingly.
So I've gone from:
Peleng 8mm, Zenitar 16mm, Hartblei 80mm Super Rotator, Sigma 10-20, DA 16-45, FA 28-105 f3.2-4.5, FA 35, FA 50 macro, FA*24 f2.0, FA*300 f4.5 and Tamron 70-300 LD Di.
To: DA 16-45, FA50 macro and DA 55-300!
It does seem pretty drastic, but I don't miss any of the ones I've disposed of, apart from perhaps the FA*300 f4.5. I'm waiting to see if the DA*60-250 can satisfactorily fill that gap as well as cover the DA55-300 range, or if I will need to replace the FA* with the DA*300. In the meantime the 55-300 is a surprisingly satisfactory fill-in, plus my back and shoulders are recovering nicely!
Eventually I may buy the DA 12-24 or 10-17 FE to cover the ultra-wide end that the 16-45 (very rarely) misses.
I've also had and decided not to keep, DA 18-55, FA 28, DA 21, DA 40, DA 70, Sigma 100-300EX. I have also had and kept until replaced, the A*300 f4.0, Tokina 20-35 AFII, Tokina 80-200 f2.8 ATX Pro, Tokina 80-400 ATXII and the Sigma terrible twins, the 18-50DG and 55-200DG.
I'm definitely am a zoom man for most work, I find I have no desire for normal primes apart from maybe a long (300mm) tele, but prime macros are great as I love flower photography. I'd love a FA*200 f4.0 macro, but that's in my dreams!
So I guess that you can recover from LBA and then start over again, but perhaps with a bit more caution and wisdom than before! ... Maybe?