Originally posted by Kozlok Sell both, get the 100 WR macro. New FL and macro
Thanks for all the wonderful inputs. My biggest problem is that I am a lens creep who is always tempted with another lens. I got tempted with the low price on Pentax 100 WR macro, bought it and later it took me 1+ full month and posting in three different forums to trade in Tamron SP 90mm. The Tamron is a great and inexpensive macro lens and it is now on its way to Austria and later to Serbia.
Because I have evolved into Sony system, I have accumulated repeated 35mm more than I would like to admit. I still love my Pentax system and I have tried hard to get rid of most unused gear while maintaining the minimalist system that I can still enjoy on APS-C. I mostly shoot with K-5 (or upgrade to K-3 in due time) and I don't see myself with K-1 until 2 years from now. I am ready for Pentax FF but I don't want to do it now as I have Sony A7 along with Sony A6000. A shame to carry two systems. It baffles me every single time when I need to look for lens cap, adapter and accessories -- where is my thing.
I need to trim my Sony system on the FE 35mm f/2.8 along with some of my Pentax 35mm.
The DA 35mm f/2.8 macro used to be my favorite lens on Pentax aps-c
20120430-mosaic4038c3ca03d6238edce7f360b5faa7241ab792c4
by
Hin Man, on Flickr
Its frequent use has been reduced as I use Voiglander 40mm f/1.4 with a helicoil adapter on Sony full frame with A7. The close up with Voiglander with adapter is quite good for my casual use. But macro and close up is very nice on the DA 35mm especially on flowers. The DA 35mm is workhorse for me with Pentax K-5 and the like.
mosaic_3
by
Hin Man, on Flickr
mosaic_2
by
Hin Man, on Flickr
One or both have to go. The Kipon adapter mounted on the DA 35mm f/2.8 can actually control the aperture with step-less control. The catch is rough guessing on the aperture.
my FE 35mm f/2.8 may have to go if I find cheaper and faster alternative with AF
I tried my FA 35mm f/2.0 tonight to mount it on my film body with Ricoh xr-p, I don't get the stop-down that I normally get from a K-mount lens.
It is likely I miss the battery but if I can't use the FA 35mm f/2.0, it is less a candidate to keep. As for the DA 35, it is a good pair to go with DFA 100mm macro for APS-C. I need to think through my usage as I use FA 31 very frequently and the DA 35 f/2.8, though an excellent lens, can't take the place of FA 31.
Thanks again to everyone's inputs. My current thinking
- confirm film usage on FA 35mm f/2.0, try the lens on Sony system, sell after the trial
- decide over DA 35mm, likely to cut it next, have a trip with WR 100mm and DA 35mm as a pair to help me firm up my decision, I have a 60/40 weight to keep it.
-
-
Sell the Sony FE 35mm f/2.8 when Sigma FE 30mm f/1.4 is out with good report. The Sigma 30 f/1.4 is a aps-c lens - May splurge for a new silver DA 21mm if I let go both FA 35 and DA 35. The DA 21 will complement handsomely for my DA 15. I currently favor 21 over the DA 20-40 as I love the size of pancake and I already have 15 and 43. My limited primes will be filled with 15, 21 (missing), 31, 43, 77 and 100.
Cheers,
Hin