Originally posted by jsherman999 Yeah, these images have that 'pro' feel to them that 31ltd and FA 85 images
seem to - good job, all.
prodigital2000 (O Canada) has one on it's way to me. I ordered it right before
I had my little lake mishap, so it's outside of budget now, but I hope to talk myself
into hanging on to it.
.
The FA43 is a darn good lens. It was poorly regarded and badly trashed on DPR until a couple years ago. The critics were actually only a few people. I guess if you scream how bad it is often enough then others believe it to be true. A few people (including me) talked about how good lens it was but positive comments were ignored.
Then a couple of forum leaders tried the lens out, discovered that it's fantastic, and now it's highly regarded.
I mentally shake my head every time I think about this. A lot of people really missed out on using this lens. You know, we are capable of making our own decisions about things.
There's more to a lens than pure sharpness or corner performance. There's also color, contrast, that fabled 3-D look, and the specular glow you can get (which no one talks about).
The FA Limiteds (and all the good Pentax lenses) have this utterly delicious combination of attributes. Plus I don't pixel peep and I've come to realize that corner performance isn't a noticeable issue when I am actually making images.
I've had prints done for friends and relatives. The technicians at the photo lab have remarked on the images produced by the FA43, and they see
lots of pictures taken by all brands of lenses.
If the FA Limiteds sported a Canon logo you can bet your next paycheque that they will cost much, much more than what we pay for them.
I think every serious prime lens user should own a complete set of the FA Limiteds. So there.