Originally posted by carlb
I've signed up for the Lomography Daguerre lens - I would probably have signed up for this one instead if I'd seen it first. It's great to see it being offered in K mount right from the start and it's another encouraging sign for Pentax I think.
As I've said, I suspect it was
because you and others (including me) signed up for the Daguerre that this one is offered in K-mount. Once they realised that Pentaxians were willing to put their money where their mouth is, they started coming to the party. I suspect also, though Lomography would need to confirm, that once the trouble and expense of gearing up for a particular mount are paid for once, they can equally be applied to most if not all subsequent Lomo lenses, since many if not all of them are uncoupled mechanicals that don't need anything at the Lomo end except the right bayonet fitting and registry distance.
Practically all of the Lomo lenses I've paid any heed seem to be derived from designs which to a K mount are passive, blind and uncommunicative anyway; I don't think they've ever offered anything more modern than from the M42 era, which only a Spotmatic could ever hope to "talk" to and then only from the POV of pressing the aperture stop-down pin (if present).
Who knows? If Lomo are here twenty or fifty years from now, we could find them offering resurrected "ancient" K 50/1.2's, with special pledges required from Canon users to obtain with specially shortened aperture arms!