Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
06-11-2010, 01:24 AM   #61
Pentaxian
Arpe's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,344
I find myself hardly ever using the 3 primes I have - lazy i guess! Hence I am currently trying to sell my A50/f1.2 in NZ. No takers so far. After that I'll see if anyone here wants it. I'll keep my FA50 and 35, but wouldn't be purprised if I sell them in the not too distant future too.
I just find the zooms so damn convenient for me, and certainly good enough IQ.

06-11-2010, 01:28 AM   #62
Veteran Member
yeatzee's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Temecula
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,675
Heck no.... I own a lot more than whats in my signature... the signature is just what I use

And I do actually use all of them frequently except the M 135mm which is just here because I can't get much if I sell it.
06-11-2010, 03:45 AM   #63
Senior Member




Join Date: May 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 191
I had two lenses I didn't use much and I just sold them. All the lenses that I have now are all in use.
06-11-2010, 04:23 AM   #64
Veteran Member
robjmitchell's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne Aus
Posts: 1,144
The poor Tak 55/1.8 doesn't get much use apart for splinter removal since i got the 43ltd.
The da 50-200 wasn't seeing much action till i started shooting lightning at night, the hard stop at infinity is really useful.
As for the Da 14, I really have to force myself to use it as the 43ltd and sigma 70 tend to get all the attention. Seriously considering changing for the Da 15 so i can have lightish 3 piece prime kit.

06-11-2010, 04:31 AM   #65
Pentaxian
Lowell Goudge's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 15,399
QuoteOriginally posted by jsherman999 Quote
.

Sometimes I like to peruse really old threads, like 150 pages ago, just to revisit old forum members who have left, see old topics that went away, and old topics that are still with us.

I was just thinking about this subject - using all our lenses, etc - and saw this old thread that I remembered.

So, with new (and old) members - do you use all the lenses you own? Why or why not? (and what ever became of the "Lonely lens Club?" I may have to bump that one too!)
I will be the first to admit that I don't use ALL the lenses I own, just like I don't use ALL the cameras I own.

I have not shot film in 3 years so my PZ-1, Ricoh XR-2s and KX sit on the shelf and look down at me in my office every day begging for use, along with my XR rikenon 50mmF2 and my vivitar 400mm F5.6. Aside from those 2 lenses and one more that will go on the shelf because it is inferior to another I picked up (135mm F2.8 rikenon M42 mount see 135mm thread for why) I use all my other lenses (26 of them) .

let's be clear, I don't use them every day, but they are there when I want them. The bulk of my lenses can be split into 3 groups. M42, K mount and AF.

I have essentually complete M42 and K mount kits, which I got into somewhat by accident. I had picked up some M42 lenses as gap fillers in my K mount kit and decided that for a minimal cost, It was more convenient to have an M42 Kit and avoid taking the adaptor out of the camera to change lenses. As a result, while there are still a few holes in each kit, I can take one or the other as I please. I have attempted to get different characteristics in the M42 lenses so that the pictures will be slightly different when shot with those lenses.

My AF kit is several high quality zooms, sigma 10-20, tamron 28-75 F2.8 and sigma 70-200F2.8 plus TCs. This is supplimented by an 8mm fisheye and 85mmF1.4 manual focus lens

wouldnt sell any
06-11-2010, 05:09 AM   #66
Veteran Member
RioRico's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Limbo, California
Posts: 11,264
HA! I don't/can't even use all my 40-odd cameras, let alone all 160+ lenses of various sorts. Of the ~100 lenses usable on my K20D and ZX-M (not counting glass that could be reversed for macro work) I actually use maybe 30, with some of the others being taken out for a walk every now and then. (If I lived somewhere of more visual interest, this might be different. Well, if I get another RV, I'll be able to take them all for a ride.) A few lenses are trash, but even they have their uses, theoretically. And I have this odd habit of mounting chunks of optical material in a bellows to see what happens with images -- do these count as lenses? Do diopters count? Pinholes? Optical copiers/scanners? A slide copier attachment?
06-11-2010, 09:08 AM   #67
Veteran Member
magkelly's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,905
Well, the lenses I bought for my Fuji digital just plain suck so I rarely take them out of the bag, but in terms of my non-digital gear, yes, I use most of what I have. I don't have but a few lenses for both film cameras actually. Only 2 for my SP1 and 1 for my Canon AE-1 at the moment. That's about to change. I'm going to pick up some sweet lenses for the AE-1 next week. I'm working for them, long story, but when I am done I'll have a major kit of lenses for that camera.

I wish my Pentax gear was looking as good actually but that may change soon. I have my eye on an SP2 for upgrading my Spottie, and I still hope to come up with a 200MM or better lens and a macro too. Patience is a virtue and I have several people looking for me out at my local flea market, and around town.

I really don't feel like I need more than 4-5 lenses per camera though. I doubt I'd keep more than that under most circumstances. Macro lens, regular lens, good portrait lens, middle of the road zoom, maybe a really long zoom if I can ever afford one for photographing wildlife, that's my idea of the perfect set up. More lenses than that seems pretty redundant to me with what I want to do and if a lesser amount of lenses can handle doing all that, I'm okay with that.
06-11-2010, 10:45 AM   #68
Veteran Member




Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 818
I have 6 lenses in my regular use kit, and then 6 or so that I have picked up as part of a kit from ebay or craigslist. Those latter six never get used, and I'm working on getting rid of them.

Of the lenses in my regular use kit, I've been neglecting 2 of them as my tastes have changed lately. I'm considering selling one of them, the Sigma 100-300mm f4, just because I don't foresee wanting to do much ~300mm photography in the future.

My FA 31mm Ltd. is getting more use than ever and I grow to love it more and more as time goes on. This means the other lenses get less love. The 31 is just so good.

06-11-2010, 10:51 AM   #69
Pentaxian
TaoMaas's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,195
No, I'm not really using all the lenses I own. I almost have 2 sets of lenses...those I use with film (which I shoot less and less frequently)...and those I use with digital.
06-11-2010, 11:10 AM   #70
Pentaxian
Marc Sabatella's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 10,686
The way things are, I can divide my lenses into three categories. Those I carry with me and use regularly (DA15, M28/2.8, DA40, DA70, M135/3.5), those that commonly supplement this kit for particular purposes (M100/2.8 and DA50-200 are the most common calls here), and the "bench warmers" that really only get pulled out very rarely on a whim (A50/1.7, M200/4, Vivitar 500/8 Mirror). My DA18-55 II probably in that last category now too, but until I got the DA15 a few months ago, it was in the second category.
06-11-2010, 11:52 AM   #71
Pentaxian
bdery's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Quebec city, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,791
I get ALL my lenses with a purpose in mind. I'd love to be a collector but I am not. Here's my lineup, with the rationale behind each one:

Sigma 17-70 : most used lens, "standard"
DA 18-55 WR : for hiking, snowshoeing, tricky weather, compactness
FA 100-300 : tele
FA 50 macro : for macro and ultra sharp necessities
F50 f1,7 : low light with the DA 21 LTD
DA 21 LTD : low light with the F50
M150 f3,5 : low light tele

There are duplicate focal lengths, but no duplicate purposes. I love my kit.
06-11-2010, 12:09 PM   #72
emr
Guest




Certainly not. First, I've found that I'm not much of a manual focus guy and I practically never use those. Then I have extra 18-55mm and 50-200mm kit zooms (own two of the first one, the latter was replaced by the 55-300mm). Then there are lenses like the 8mm fisheye that I like having, but use nearly never. In practice I tend to have one or two favorite lenses (usually the newest ones) that I really use. Like at the moment I just tend to switch between the DFA 100mm f/2.8 WR and the DA 15mm ltd.

Actually I'd probably do pretty well with just a DA* 16-50mm, but I refuse to buy one until Pentax does something about the SDM issue.
06-11-2010, 01:42 PM   #73
Ash
Community Manager
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 22,691
I'm with bdery, rationalising all my lens purchases according to practicality. I must have a defined purpose for each lens, but even so I have lenses that overlap each other in focal length, e.g. DA 55-300 and Tamron 70-200.

So when the Mrs asks why there are so many lenses around, I've got a justifiable answer for her.
06-11-2010, 01:44 PM   #74
Veteran Member
farfisa's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,274
QuoteOriginally posted by Ash Quote
I'm with bdery, rationalising all my lens purchases according to practicality. I must have a defined purpose for each lens, but even so I have lenses that overlap each other in focal length, e.g. DA 55-300 and Tamron 70-200.

So when the Mrs asks why there are so many lenses around, I've got a justifiable answer for her.
I was thinking this thread title could've been started by the Mrs!

Well, are you wearing all your shoes?
06-11-2010, 02:07 PM   #75
axl
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nove Zamky, Slovakia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,181
I always try to build the line up in the way that I don't have to feel bad for leaving out any lens.
One reason is because I'm "fairly" indecisive so having only one lens in each position makes my life a helluva easier
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
17-70mm, 50-200mm, camera, da, flash, k-mount, lens, lenses, macro, pentax lens, sigma, slr lens, time
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax Km and old manual lenses: SMC Takumars & Tamron Adaptall 2 lenses Kendrick Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 10 04-14-2010 03:23 AM
For Sale - Sold: Yard sale: M lenses, K 300mm, DA 14mm, ME film body, Nikkor lenses and more Nachodog Sold Items 24 12-26-2009 12:03 AM
For Sale - Sold: Lenses, lenses, lenses... and a flash! pbo Sold Items 18 05-28-2009 04:35 PM
For Sale - Sold: M42 / K / KA / FA Lenses Grab bag of Vintage to Current lenses. 50mm FA f/1.4 MikeDubU Sold Items 10 02-09-2009 12:45 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:52 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top