Originally posted by joshuamcateer Am I wrong, am I missing something about the system? Is it their nostalgic charm? Do they capture that quintessentially Pentax light that each epitomises what it is to shoot Pentax (just like the creamy Leica-look. Or that Hasselblad feel)?
I used to ask similar questions long ago, but since I move to Japan, and every big electronic stores (that sale Pentax) have almost every Pentax lenses for people to test which I take full advance of that fact. Well, I am not going to say they can make a better image or they have better color or even sharper.
But in short, yes, they are difference. The build quality is always better with Limited lens. "If" I can find 2 lenses with similar focal length and they offer similar image quality, one a more expensive limited, and one not, I would go for Limited anyway. It is the same reason why sometime I walk longer distance to get a more expensive cup of coffee when I know a cheaper cup of coffee at 7/11 around the corner can give me caffeine too.
Beside that, I don't think the DA limited are expensive. for FA line up, well, I think the 31 is a kind of expensive but not too expensive still.
For every limited lenses, build quality alone can justify its prince.
I see you mention about FA43;
I try both 43 and 40 limited with K-1 quite often because I was thinking of getting this combination. My 2cents, I like DA40 on K-1 more. it focus faster, pancake, cheaper, lighter and it is very sharp on K-1.