Originally posted by Kunzite This is what I said.
Yes, my comment sounded confusing, but I was agreeing with you.
Just saying that it would be like trying to get more detail out of the same physical portion of the glass.
Some some sort of sharpness issues might be highlighted with the K3 vs the K1, correct?
Thanks for the input!
---------- Post added 01-16-2017 at 07:44 AM ----------
Originally posted by sbh I've been following this discussion and there are some good thoughts. Now I just got a 70-200 myself and I think I got a bad copy, unfortunately it's not what I expected.
SBH,
That's very interesting. Is that the K3 or K1 or ??
See on my copy it seemed like every once in a while I could get a sharp shot. So I kept thinking it wasn't the glass, it was the AF or IS or something else I was doing.
Looks like you got a nice test chart, and some testing going. Are you comparing it to the 100mm Macro D FA 2.8?
What is your distance to the test chart.
Very interested to hear more about your situation.
Thanks for posting!