Originally posted by timw4mail Does anything about the Zeiss lenses really stand out, or is it brand more than anything?
Not unimpressed with the Zeiss lenses I have, F2.8 50mm lenses were and are cheap I suppose. Some of their better lenses are close to being objects of worship with some photographers.
The Carl Zeiss Jena lens I had and did think was good was the 135mm F3.5 Sonnar, quite sharp and probably as good if not better than my Super Tak 135mm F3.5. However I have other 135mm lenses as sharp and a Pentacon 135mm with F2.8 that provides nice bokeh so I sold my two and did not lose any money.
If you are still looking for lenses, on a budget, Rikenon 50mms are good and sharp, some Petri prime lenses are good, I like my 135mm, actually as you already know there is a wealth of pleasure in old lenses just waiting to be acquired. I keep trying for a Helios 135mm but no luck so far. When I see something new, I check the reviews and hope I can get it without my wife finding out, she keeps telling me to get rid of a lot of what I have and free up some space.