Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
05-13-2017, 06:41 AM   #16
Pentaxian At Large
Loyal Site Supporter
robgski's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,014
QuoteOriginally posted by pres589 Quote
I don't remember seeing soft/distorted corners in FF shots from the 40XS.
Nor do I, but before we open up that discussion further, I'll point out that there are other threads qhich have examined the 40mm and other lenses on FF

05-13-2017, 06:54 AM   #17
Senior Member
climit's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kalamata
Posts: 224
simple photography talking, the xs is a bad lens since it can have no hood. The 40 ltd is a very good lens.
05-13-2017, 07:13 AM   #18
Pentaxian
Na Horuk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Slovenia, probably
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 11,183
Just two more notes. First, there were already a couple threads about DA 40mm ltd vs 40mm XS. You can search for them, maybe some have sample photos.

Also, there is this thread dedicated to the 40mm XS. Pretty much all of the photos are on crop cameras, but they show how good the lens can be:
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/122-lens-clubs/203708-da-40-xs-flat-wonder-club-7.html
05-13-2017, 08:57 AM   #19
Pentaxian
Saltwater Images's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Newfoundland
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 475
I have the HD DA 40 Limited find it to be an outstanding piece of kit - that said I wouldn't have purchased it had I already owned the DA 40 XS. No real optical benefit. Perhaps you should consider putting your cash toward a HD DA 35 f/2.8 Macro or the earlier SMC version?

05-13-2017, 09:26 AM   #20
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 685
I have the 40 HD limited and it is an excellent lens optically. The metal construction is nice too. When I was looking for a 40mm, I considered the xs. I decided to get the 40 limited due to the very small hood, which keeps the lens very compact. I got a good deal on the HD which also helped. I think the 40 limited, on the used market, is one of the best bargains out there. Just make sure it comes with the original hood as they are kinda pricy if you have to replace it.
05-13-2017, 09:57 AM   #21
Senior Member




Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Albi, Tarn, France
Photos: Albums
Posts: 101
QuoteOriginally posted by Kozlok Quote
Get the 43. I sold my 40ltd to robgski as soon as I decided I liked the 43 better. If you don't like it better, sell it. If you do, sell the xs
Yes go for a 43mm f1.9 I sold my 40mm for it, and I don't regret.
05-13-2017, 10:54 AM   #22
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
pres589's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Lawrence, KS
Photos: Albums
Posts: 2,286
A 27 to 49mm step up ring fixes a number of issues with the 40XS. I would consider that strongly if I had some lens money to spend.
05-13-2017, 11:01 AM   #23
Pentaxian
D1N0's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: ---
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,464
QuoteOriginally posted by pres589 Quote
I don't remember seeing soft/distorted corners in FF shots from the 40XS.
I checked it in the K-1 Lab on the K-1 special site. Sadly the xs images are now gone (they had the same scene as the DA 40mm ltd samples). But this xs sample clearly shows soft corners:
http://k-1-lab.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/344146_20160515194402_100600-2000x1335.jpg

05-13-2017, 02:41 PM   #24
Pentaxian




Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,548
If you do manual focus fairly often, the DA 40mm obviously has better ergonomics and quick shift. Otherwise, the optical quality seems to be equal. Even though not having quick shift, the FA 43mm might be the way to go for you as another lens to add, since it handles even better for MF than the DA 40mm (I have both), and is a substantially faster lens. It is not much physically larger, except for its hood, which is designed for FF use. And that is another point- it will serve even better for FF than will the DA 40mm, since that is what it was designed to do, so if there might be a FF body or film shooting ahead, you will be ready.

But to actually enhance your FL range and at the same time with a faster lens, consider adding the awesome FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited!
05-13-2017, 03:07 PM   #25
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: PA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 408
another vote for the 43mm, whatever you pay for it, it's worth every penny.
05-13-2017, 04:30 PM   #26
Pentaxian
Na Horuk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Slovenia, probably
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 11,183
When DXO tested the HD 40mm ltd I used their comparison tool to check the SMC 40mm and 40mm XS. On some bodies, the 40mm XS is rated as highest. On another body, the HD 40mm as highest. Basically, I think the sample variation between individual lenses is bigger than any differences in the actual lens optics. Anyone can get a good copy of one lens or a bad copy of another.

One thing you might want is to go to a store and hold the Limited in hands. That can make your decision easier. If you really love the feel of the Ltd (barrel, focus ring, QS, lens hood), then you might want to sell the XS.
05-13-2017, 11:26 PM - 1 Like   #27
Senior Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
BigMackCam's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North-East of England
Posts: 11,921
QuoteOriginally posted by climit Quote
simple photography talking, the xs is a bad lens since it can have no hood.
Whilst I take your point, I respectfully disagree

I shoot a lot of different vintage lenses - mostly Soviet, but others too - that suffer ghosting and veiling flare when used without a hood around strong light sources. In the vast majority of cases, the flare can be avoided with a well-placed hand, so it just becomes a matter of technique and skill.

In any case, for the DA40XS I'm guessing it would be simple enough to fit a 27mm-to-49mm step up ring and an inexpensive generic hood?

Last edited by BigMackCam; 05-14-2017 at 03:09 AM.
05-14-2017, 02:50 AM   #28
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gladys, Virginia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 19,462
For what its worth, the DA 40 limited needs to be stopped down to have decent corners on full frame. I find that before f5.6 there is significant vignetting and softness in the corners. The XS version is probably not much different.
05-14-2017, 03:13 AM   #29
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2015
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,288
If you already have the 40XS and have been happy with the images you get from it, there is no need IMO to double up. Save the money for something else.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
k-mount, pentax lens, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Pentax DA40mm f/2.8 Limited (Worldwide) kangeroo82 Sold Items 4 02-13-2011 09:32 AM
For Sale - Sold: DA40mm F2.8 limited and DA70mm F2.4 limited (Worldwide) Harish Hegde Sold Items 3 09-25-2010 10:55 AM
DA40mm limited or FA43mm limited on K7 kuau Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 12 05-01-2010 10:11 AM
Weekend Away - Pentax DA40mm Limited test dugrant153 Post Your Photos! 4 10-29-2007 10:23 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:12 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top