It looks like you don’t have a macro in your correction? DA35 limited sounds very good to me.
Bang for the buck is the DA35 f2.4
I used to have a FA35 f2. It is a bit soft at f2, but more than usable. It is very sharp from f2.2. at f4 it super sharp. From my small test and seeing by eyes at 100%, it surpass FA31 at f4, hand-down. Bokeh is not as nice but it is very good already. (Of Course, what am I talking about? I am trying to compare it to a lens 3-4 times more expensive!). It produce a very nice color and contrast but note that I like color and contrast from film era lenses. If you want a DA limited style color and contrast from FA35, it can be done in post. The build quality is not as nice as the Limited, but it cheaper, right? I sold it and the new owner said my copy is sharper wide-open than his last copy. It seems like a Quality Control problem.
If I have to select lens in that focal range I would get a FA31! Sorry off topic.
I would go with either FA35 or DA35 limited. The question is, do you want macro or you want a few extra stop of light? If you want both, get both!