I own a HD 21mm F3.2 AL Limited & HD 35mm F2.8 Macro Limited. Both fantastic lenses, and I love them, well loved them. Since moving to FF they've seen very little use. I find I use my K3 to support my K1 with DA* zooms, rather than the primes. I use mainly primes on my K1 - I only say that, coz I'm actually rather partial to primes when aiming for the best quality I can manage. Now I'm thinking walkabout with the K3 ...
I don't really have a walkabout option for the K1 and I was wondering whether to sell my 21 & 35 and buy, with the proceeds, a HD 20-40mm, reasoning it's similar weight to the 35, but WR and more flexible. Yes I know it will not have the 35's edge to edge sharpness, but it will probably compare well with the 21 and not really be that far off the 35 for a walkabout lens. Swapping for the 20-40 hopefully will mean my old K3 will see more action as it will be a lighter package than my 16-50 which I find I can't use as a walkabout combination. (I have 15mm limited, which I'll never sell, to complement whatever choice I make)
The 20-40 does seem to have rather a mixed bag of views, and I need (
) advice ... I suppose this is really another (groan) quality V convenience/ prime V zoom question, but because it's specific I hope it's got some value as I can't decide.
Thoughts, anyone please ? Many thanks.