Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
08-12-2019, 12:21 PM   #16
Unregistered User

The (badly translated) instructions that came with the 560mm seem to imply that you should not use that lens without a filter installed.

09-26-2019, 04:30 AM   #17
Unregistered User

QuoteOriginally posted by dlh Quote
The (badly translated) instructions that came with the 560mm seem to imply that you should not use that lens without a filter installed.
Actually, the instructions said both that the filter is optional and also that the lens cannot be used without the filter. Some ambiguity there, so I wrote to Ricoh, which, after about six weeks, wrote back and said, "follow the instructions".

Update: while fooling around trying to figure out how to do astrophotography, I experimented a bit with the 560mm.

Now, I'm one of those people who use a UV filter on the front if it's threaded and leave it on all the time both for physical protection of the objective element as well as to cut haze and such. So I'd replaced the one that came with the 560mm from the factory (in the back-mounted holder) and put a new one on the front (like, 112mm diameter), using Chiaro 99-UVbts filters.

So, in my low-light experiements, even though these filters are supposed to attenuate the light by only one percent each, I pulled 'em both out. In part because a UV filter is designed to suck up light at the blue end of the spectrum, and I figured there are likely to be stars out there of such color that the filters would interfere.

When I pulled the back-mounted one, I realized that the holder the filter screws into is itself screwed into a ring-gear, and they're on opposite sides of a plate, so they hold each other in place. When you unscrew the filter, the holder-plate may be unscrewed from the ring-gear, rather than the filter from the mount. When that happens, the ring-gear can be inadvertently left in the lens, and when it pops out from the mounting plate, it can rattle around loose inside the lens, and that can't be good.

So I came to the conclusion that the reason the instructions are ambiguous is that (1) optically, the filter really is optional; and (2) you should not remove the filter because that could cause internal damage to the lens if you don't get things exactly right and the ring-gear gets loose.

My solution in this case was to take the filter, the filter-mount, and the ring-gear out, all of 'em, and stick 'em in plastic bags, and returned the empty holder to the lens slot.

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
40.5mm, 560mm, da, da 560mm, da560mm, filter, filter holder, holder, holder of da, k-mount, normal filter, pentax, pentax lens, pentax normal 40.5mm, rear filter holder, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Pentax Q 01 prime lens (8.5mm 1:1.9) with front and rear caps Sluggo Sold Items 3 09-07-2017 08:41 PM
Source for 40.5mm filters for 25mm f4 DA lens Ed Hurst Pentax Medium Format 24 04-03-2015 10:35 AM
Recommend a 40.5mm 9- or 10-stop ND filter?? mikeSF Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 12 05-25-2013 06:30 PM
4x6 filter holder for 645 25mm D FA Ryan Tischer Pentax Medium Format 0 05-24-2012 12:43 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:57 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]