12-24mm is very good indeed. Looking at photozone.de maybe better in sharpness and more. But it is not good at 24mm as in 12mm and 18mm. And there are some comments that color is a bit colder.
I also examined the 14mm in photozone -that I better understand them now I think- and I thought 14mm is not perfect either.
I wonder If they worth the money, either one. Of course it is essential for a naturalist, but I live in a metropol working for 5-6 days a week.
Maybe I should reconsider my priorities.
I think the lens I use most should be the best one, don't you think?
And It is about 30-40mm I suppose.
For a walkaround lens,
FA35 is scary sharp but bokeh is not there.
*16-50 , I can't take the risk of a bad copy
Tell me, is it better to make it 31mm + 50mm 1.4 + 100mm macro and to add a DA15 Ltd in time -or 14mm maybe-
or
go for 14mm + 50mm + 100macro then add a DA*30 or FA31mm?
Maybe that was all a deduction to get a 31mm Limited, you tell me ?
BTW a quick question,
is it an overlay in wide range, an 14mm and 16-45 or 16-50.
Thank you.
Last edited by apemen; 08-30-2008 at 07:16 AM.