Originally posted by Sandy Hancock Well played!
One word of caution: I returned my 20-40 because its IQ at the wide end was unacceptable except in the very centre. Many others have not had the same experience, so I'm sure I was just unlucky. Don't settle for a poor copy.
Is the 50/1.7 the FA, F, A or M? They all have a fine reputation.
Thanks Sandy.
I will not settle! ( :
FA.
A nifty fifty on a crop body brings me back to my first dslr and lens.
A Nikon D50 and 50 1.8d in 2005. I skipped the kit lens and shot that thing at F1.8 for weeks.
Over exposed a few stops and all.
---------- Post added 12-30-17 at 09:42 PM ----------
Originally posted by monochrome I always thought so, but my FA50/1.4 has been boxed for two years and I haven’t mounted a manual 50 in forever. K-1 and film have been 31, 35, 43, 77, 85, 105, 24~ 70 and 28 ~ 105.
A normal lens no matter how good doesn't stand a chance with focal lengths and attributes like those. ( :