Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
09-09-2008, 07:25 AM   #16
Senior Member




Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 269
Original Poster
another question about jupiter-9

see here
Enlarged

but black version has not info written on aperture ring?

how can choose aperture if there are not info on aperture ring?

09-09-2008, 08:10 AM   #17
TDN
Forum Member
TDN's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 96
QuoteOriginally posted by platinum Quote
another question about jupiter-9

see here
Enlarged

but black version has not info written on aperture ring?

how can choose aperture if there are not info on aperture ring?
The Jupiter works with a pre-set aperture. This means you turn 1 ring in the front of the lens to the aperture you want, and turn another to manually close the diaphragm to that aperture.

Don't worry, it will have markings, you just can't see them on the picture.

I have the same lens and am very pleased with it. A little soft at f2, but very nice at f2.8

Tom
09-09-2008, 09:35 AM   #18
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by TDN Quote

Don't worry, it will have markings, you just can't see them on the picture.
The markings are on the far side of the lens on the same surface where it is marked "MC Jupiter - 9". The setup is a little different in that the aperture ring is the first ring from the front, followed by the preset ring, followed by the focus ring.

Steve

(Also a proud owner of a lens similar to the one pictured...)
09-09-2008, 09:36 AM   #19
Senior Member




Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 269
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by TDN Quote
The Jupiter works with a pre-set aperture. This means you turn 1 ring in the front of the lens to the aperture you want, and turn another to manually close the diaphragm to that aperture.

Don't worry, it will have markings, you just can't see them on the picture.

I have the same lens and am very pleased with it. A little soft at f2, but very nice at f2.8

Tom
QuoteOriginally posted by stevebrot Quote
The markings are on the far side of the lens on the same surface where it is marked "MC Jupiter - 9". The setup is a little different in that the aperture ring is the first ring from the front, followed by the preset ring, followed by the focus ring.


you are right! there are 2 ring for aperture + 1 ring for manual focus!

i didn't see the first ring in the front of the lens (on the same surface where it is marked "MC Jupiter - 9") and on this ring there are the number (2 2.8 4...)!!

thanks

09-09-2008, 09:44 AM   #20
Veteran Member
Gooshin's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto, the one in Canada.
Posts: 5,610
aslo, theoretically you dont have to select "2" or "2.8"

if you put the aperture selector into the maximum and just leave it there, then use the secondary aperture ring to choose from an infinite selection of diaphragm diameters....

if you want 2.0001, you got it, 2.7459908, you got it

09-09-2008, 09:49 AM   #21
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by Gooshin Quote
aslo, theoretically you dont have to select "2" or "2.8"

if you put the aperture selector into the maximum and just leave it there, then use the secondary aperture ring to choose from an infinite selection of diaphragm diameters....

if you want 2.0001, you got it, 2.7459908, you got it

Gooshin is right. In practice, you use the Av mode and have the option of moving the preset ring until you have the shutter speed or DOF you desire.

Steve
09-09-2008, 10:47 AM   #22
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Ohio (formerly SF Bay Area)
Posts: 1,519
Are there any issues with infinity focus on the M39 version?

I'm using the genuine (flangeless) Pentax M42-K adapter, and would have an M39-M42 adapter on the lens too, of course.

Some say there's a slight register length difference between M39 and M42:

Manual Focus Forum / Mir 1V not sharp

. . . which causes me to worry a bit.

09-09-2008, 02:39 PM   #23
Veteran Member
Miserere's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,993
QuoteOriginally posted by Gooshin Quote
aslo, theoretically you dont have to select "2" or "2.8"

if you put the aperture selector into the maximum and just leave it there, then use the secondary aperture ring to choose from an infinite selection of diaphragm diameters....

if you want 2.0001, you got it, 2.7459908, you got it

I find myself using 2.458961 most of the time. It seems to provide just the right DoF.
09-09-2008, 03:10 PM   #24
Senior Member




Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 269
Original Poster
what is a good aperture for portraits?

2.8 is ok?
09-09-2008, 06:13 PM   #25
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2007
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,237
QuoteOriginally posted by Miserere Quote
I find myself using 2.458961 most of the time. It seems to provide just the right DoF.

f/3.14159265 gets you circular bokeh highlights, for some reason....


.
09-09-2008, 06:26 PM   #26
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by jsherman999 Quote
f/3.14159265 gets you circular bokeh highlights, for some reason....


.


I was going to post the same comment!

Steve
09-13-2008, 08:38 AM   #27
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2008
Location: Russia, Siberia, Novosibirsk
Posts: 323
As far as I know:
- Silver is m39 (45,5 working flange) version
- Black is m42

(the same thing with Helios-40 (silver m39) and Helios-40-2 (black m42) - 85/1.5)
09-13-2008, 10:25 AM   #28
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by Zebooka Quote
As far as I know:
- Silver is m39 (45,5 working flange) version
- Black is m42

(the same thing with Helios-40 (silver m39) and Helios-40-2 (black m42) - 85/1.5)
My understanding is that the black versions are all M42 and that all M39 versions are silver. The silver lenses supposedly were made in several different mounts including M39 and M42.

Edit: Regarding black versions of the Jupiter-9. The Kiev medium-format bayonet version of the J-9 was also done in black (Yes there is a Kiev bayonet version...made by Arsenal in the Ukraine with a very attractive build and fully auto diaphragm as well!)

Steve

Last edited by stevebrot; 09-23-2008 at 06:04 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
85mm, jupiter-9, k-mount, pentax lens, slr lens, version

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jupiter-9 85mm figmental1978 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 87 05-02-2010 11:03 PM
For Sale - Sold: Jupiter-9 85mm f2.0 Gooshin Sold Items 22 03-13-2009 12:42 PM
Jupiter-9 85mm and exposure platinum Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 13 10-15-2008 05:56 AM
For Sale - Sold: FS: Jupiter-9 85mm f/2.0 igowerf Sold Items 12 01-17-2008 03:36 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:56 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top