Originally posted by mikesbike Right, Lev. I'm not hearing anything on your video that is different than what I can detect with my copy. And as you say, I have to have my ear close to hear it. The main (very slight) noise is when the rotation is stopped and is disengaged to proceed in either direction. I am essentially hearing on my copy what I am hearing on yours. When the lens's rotation is stopped, there is that little "free space" where it is disengaged. It can clack as it is re-engaged.
yes absolutely identical to what you're saying. I'm slowly but painfully leaning towards direction that nothing wrong is with our copies in this regard.
Today I went even farther and did some glass tests for decentering/misalignment. Successfully passed Zeiss circle chart test, perfect OOF results but in ISO 12233, there were interesting things happening. The right side corners were little less sharp than left corners in all aperture settings. I know it's an offtopic but it's a good moment to ask because maybe others who are going to test their lenses may consider this. Well, thing is that, then I've got an idea to rotate my chart 180 degrees and see what happens, I was totally shocked because now left side corners were little soft compared to right side. I immediately started to examine the paper on which this chart was printed and.... veery hardly I've discovered that the printing itself was not quite perfect at right side (slightly less ink, maybe 5% less I don't know, but indeed different quality), but interesting is that this was very hard to find, and how easily the lens picked up this difference. So now my main thought on this is that it was printed on laser printer with 600 DPI resolution. Now the question is, does it matters if you print it on laser or on inkjet printer with glossy paper?