Originally posted by pres589 I've been saying this for some time now, that something between 24 and 28mm should have been here a long time ago. Canon has that 24mm STM prime and Pentax, the small prime company, has...
How do you like the F 28 vs. the FA? The F seems more sharp, the FA seems more pixel-dusty, but I've used neither.
Not had a chance to play yet, hopefully this weekend - will report back. I found my copy of the FA 28 to be plenty sharp at 3.2 and above, very good at 5.6 up. It was however noticeably softer at 2.8. I am hoping the F 28 will do better wide open, but we will see. I certainly place quality of rendering over ultimate sharpness so that will be the key test, does it have the pentax pixies?
a modern small 24 or 28 (no need personally for it to be faster then 2.8, i'm even open to 3.2) would be brilliant. I love the 21, but i do often find it a touch wide.
Agree with the idea of a plastic-fantastic build too - yes WR would be great, but my DA 35 2.4 did 3 months on an african building site with no problems whatsoever - and I went in thinking I won't be gentle, if it's a write off so be it.