Originally posted by McLovin Thanks for the help so far guys. I do already have and use the kit lens that came with the K10D, and I agree it's a pretty good lens and it's what I've been using so far. My only other lens is the Tamron Af 90mm 1:1 macro lens which I use for macro shots but can't use at all for landscapes.
The reason I am wondering about wide angle is because for me, landscape shots basically mean shots of mountain ranges (I live in BC, I notice a lot of you who posted in this thread do as well so you know what I mean haha) but then again I've never used a wide angle lens so I don't really know what the benefit will be, I've just been told wide angle is good for that kind of thing.
I could definitely just stick with the kit lens though for a while, the adjustable focal length is nice and since I've been doing "okay" with it (like I said, still learning in general) and like someone mentioned I could always try the panarama feature if I feel like doing something different.
Have been in your position and understand where you are coming from. I made a few mistakes that maybe you can avoid.
My/our kit lenses were Sigma 18-125 & Pentax 18-55, both are very capable of taking good photos, however I was looking for something "more". I purchased a Sigma EX DG 24mm f1.8 which also did a good job (probably better than 'good').... but not wide enough although I had my low light situations covered. Note that I bought the lens in the absence of being able to get anything else at short notice.
Eventually I have added the DA 14mm and 43 Ltd. With respect, I suggest you look at doing something along those lines. They are that good, and whilst not "in-expensive" neither are they outrageous. In fact the 43Ltd is great value for what it is and does.
Others to consider are Pentax 12-24, and any of the primes.
Good luck with your decision.
Last edited by Mallee Boy; 09-20-2008 at 12:36 AM.
Reason: gramma