Originally posted by monochrome
40 years of LBA:
K17/4FE | K18/3.5 | A20/2.8 | K20/4 | K24/2.8 | K24/3.5 | K28/2 | K28/3.5 | K28/3.5 SHIFT | K30/2.8 | K35/2 | K35/3.5 | A50/1.2 | K50/1.2 | A50/1.4 | K50/1.4 | K50/4 Macro | K55/1.8 | K55/2 | K85/1.8 | K100/4 Bellows | K100/4 Macro | K105/2.8 | K120/2.8 | K135/2.5 | K135/3.5 | K150/4 | K200/2.5 | K200/4 | K400/5.6 | K500/4.5 | K1000/8
Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 Macro ‘Bokina’ + 1:1 Extension
Adaptall-2 SP 35~80/2.8~3.8 01a
Auto-Takumar 85/1.8
CZ Ultron 1,8/50
ST35/3.5 | ST50/1.4 | ST50/1.4 (8) | SMCT55/1.8
FA31/1.8. | FA43/1.9 | FA77/1.8
O my God! That's a collection!
---------- Post added 02-27-2019 at 11:03 PM ----------
Originally posted by robbiec
Been there done that. You need to swap out the nifty 50s for the A50/1.2 for a season or 2.
The Samyang really needs to be replaced by the 77, no question.
The 43, it is along with the 77 the best bang for buck you'll get anywhere but there are like driving an 80s hot hatchback verses the sheer competence of newer models with 250+ horsepower. You can take either on a wet twisty road like Molls Gap close by to me but you'll forever remember the 80s car for the input you had to make and its the same with the 43. Learn and play to its strengths and it'll blow you away.
I'll throw in a curve ball for your LBA, the DA*50-135/2.8, doesn't have the reach of the 55-300 but in its range capable of utter magic.
S!
Well, I don't do many portraits so I think my Samyang it's enough, especially that I like shallow depth photography so, from time to time it's useful and I think it's got the best smooth bokeh I have ever seen!
43mm limited... I'm not impressed by my 31 yet so, I don't know.
50-135mm, too big and I'm not a wedding guy...
50mm f1.2... I've seen images wide open, very hard to hit the focus, bad image... My 55mm sdm it's enough and f 50mm and Helios 44-k...
I'd rather go with 40mm limited. I love the colors and contrast of that lens maybe better contrast than 43?
Last edited by zburatoru; 02-27-2019 at 11:39 PM.