Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
07-10-2019, 07:29 PM   #31
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 18,456
Look 50mm is close to the focal plane distance making these not telephoto OR retrofocal. A simple design with high levels of softness and vignetting make tge 50mm 1.4 design smaller - but look at tge FA 35 f2 or an older 1.4 35mm. Those are also much smaller than modern 35mm 1.4 lenses. The 85 f1.4 designs had higher expectstions and more glass I'm sure they could have been a little smaller with more modest goals.

Look at apples to apples. The modern fat fifty lenses are all large or have significant compromises. The difference is glass, sharpness wide open, and vignetting.

07-11-2019, 02:42 AM - 1 Like   #32
Veteran Member

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Somewhere near the middle...
Posts: 302
These comments above are the sum of cummulative knowledge and experience... It never ceases to amaze me how inclusive and helpful all of you are.

Keep up the good work. Cheers!

07-11-2019, 03:07 AM   #33
Site Supporter
Site Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gladys, Virginia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 23,029
I think the big questions are whether you plan to use the lens on full frame (the DA 40 isn't very compatible with full frame) and if you shoot a lot of wide apertures (the DA 40 only goes to f2.8).

In general, the DA limiteds are created to have good contrast, excellent flare resistance, and nice colors in a small size. They do this by having slow-ish apertures and typically great Pentax coatings. I use my DA 15 and DA 40 mainly for landscape situations and have been pleased with both of them, but I don't think they could take the place of f1.4 lenses. I mainly got the DA 40 because I bought a K-01 and wanted a couple of small lenses to mount on it -- the DA 15 and 40 seemed to fit the bill quite nicely.
07-11-2019, 07:18 PM   #34
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
johnha's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lancashire, UK
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,083
I really like my M40/2.8 or Voigtlander 40/1.4 (Leica M4) or 43/1.9 Ltd on film or FF, but I struggle to make the focal length work on APS-C (too long and not really long enough). I do use a 28mm as an equivalent on APS-C.

The M40/2.8 really does make an MX or Super-A very compact, this and the focal length easily makes up for the slower aperture.


  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
f/1.4, k-mount, pentax lens, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Pentax Cameras and Lenses (K-01, K-5, K-3, 18-135, 20-40, 50-135, 15, 30, 40, 50) jazz_711 Sold Items 18 05-27-2019 11:00 PM
DA 40 Ltd hood on M 40 on full frame? pres589 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 7 08-29-2018 01:50 PM
Why would I buy an fa31 if I have the da 20-40? TroutHunterJohn Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 42 04-17-2015 06:14 AM
Night Why Why Why eccentricphotography Pentax K-3 Photo Contest 3 06-02-2014 09:36 AM
Burning of the Koran ... ! Why? Why? Why? jpzk General Talk 128 09-14-2010 04:45 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:13 PM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]