Originally posted by ivandimarco The 24 might be a fascinating option for many photographers out there, but personally I don't like the focal length. Don't know why, but even when I was shooting digital with the 24-70 I never really use it at 24. I believe it's the way I approach the subject, trying not to go too wide. Let's say 28 is the widest I'll go in my landscape images! I appreciate the suggestion though!
For what I understood, both lenses are great. The 28 is often cheaper than the 35 online, so I believe I'll go for it!
Sounds like you've decided, but it may not be too late for me to add a short two cents. I have both the 28 and 35 (several versions of both) and have found the 35mm to be the better lens overall. Image quality is similar for both, but the 35 is SO much smaller and lighter. You did say you were going for a lightweight kit, right? There are very few circumstances where it will really matter between either lens in terms of field of view, but the 28 is a much larger/heavier lens.