Originally posted by wed7 Is the 18-270 worth it?
I used to have its predecessor, the 18-250. Very handy for travel or whenever it's difficult to change lenses.
Sharpness is usually reasonably good on these lenses, particularly in the centre, at the wide end and stopped down. At f8 and in good light, the 18-250 was OK:
On the 18-250, sharpness fell off significantly at the long end (the 18-270 is said to be the same). It also suffered from a lot of focus breathing, so the field of view was wider than you would expect. It had a tendency to nisen bokeh. Lots of purple fringing. Lots of barrel distortion at the wide end, although that was usually fixable in post.
I see you have a nice collection of Limiteds. The images from a superzoom would often be a come-down from them. The difference in microcontrast would be particularly striking. If you could manage a combination of the DA 18-135 and one of the DA 55-300 lenses instead, the results would be less jarring in comparison.
If you do decide to get a superzoom, consider the Sigma 18-300. Extra reach and it seems to be well-regarded.