Originally posted by Kiwizinho Sigma 17-70 2.8-4.5 is my most useful lens that I'd never want to be without, although I've been tossing up getting a DA 16-85
Pros with the Sigma: Faster aperture, close focus 'macro'. Pros with the DA 16-85: Bigger zoom range, weather sealed, quick shift, silent AF.
I have both. In practice, the larger zoom range is nice, but not major. The weather sealing is what did it for me. I think the Sigma is a little soft wide open, so it's effectively the same aperture as the 16-85, which is good from wide open. At the same apertures, the 16-85 is a little sharper, and the images are more pleasing, but the differences are not large. The downside is cost of the 16-85.
If you are on a budget, and don't need WR, I'd keep the Sigma and spend the money on a prime lens or a wide lens.