Originally posted by Dartmoor Dave I interpreted the original post as just another of those "Why doesn't Pentax do this thing that Canon does?" moans. But I can see that others who know the original poster's history are taking it as a genuine question to be considered seriously, so my apologies to the OP if I misinterpreted his point.
No worries. I could have just said "what are some good choices to put together a Pentax FF three zoom kit for landscape photos." (Which I probably should have now that I think about it...
) And I'm not particularly interested in copying Thomas Heaton either. (Not at all actually
) But Canon has arguably the largest in production lens range of any manufacturer and if I were to choose a Canon FF body I'd have the 16-35 F4/24-105 F4 (or maybe the 24-70 F2.8) and the 70-200 F4 IS as my lens selection (which as you notice is actually different from what TH chose.)
There may be more selection in Pentax land actually than Canon if you factor in ALL the lenses made for the K mount over the years, but identifying them and finding them can make for difficult navigation, but it's also part of the fun of shooting Pentax. (And why I asked the PF, and look at the AWESOME suggestions!!!)
The K1/Mark II is a great body and Pentax's ergos are the best in the business. I also have an Oly system, but I am considering swapping that over to APSc Pentax, either the KP or the new K? whatever it will be. Mirrorless is fun, but it also creates it's own issues, I see it as 6 of one 1/2 dozen of another. But mirrorless is smaller and lighter, at least for the bodies.