Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-03-2019, 02:20 PM - 14 Likes   #1
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: North Wales
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,177
Pentax DFA 150-450mm vs Sigma DG 150-500mm APO HSM. K3-ii test pics.

There are already some threads discussing how "bigma's" compare to the DFA 150-450mm:


Pentax 150-450 vs Sigma 150-500 questions - PentaxForums.com
Pentax 150-450 vs Sigma 50-500 OS - PentaxForums.com
DFA 150-450 vs Sigma 150-500 - PentaxForums.com

Since I have the DFA 150-450mm and have just acquired a non-OS example of the Sigma DG 150-500mm APO HSM I have been able to take comparison images at different focal lengths.


150mm, the tower on the Telford railway bridge. I thought both lenses were really good at 150mm, both sharp from wide open. The sigma perhaps showed a little more fringing/purpling on some backlit twigs, and the DFA seemed a bit better at coping with the dynamic range from the shady side to the sunlit side. Both lenses were good across the frame, so I haven't bothered with edge crops.





UPDATE: another point of comparison, the sigma apo 100-300mm f4 at 150mm. Very similar iq.





300mm, one of the turrets on Conwy Castle. Unfortunately I couldn't get the tourist in in both sets, so the DFA shots are just of the same point of the turret. Again I was impressed with both lenses, both lenses looked softer at f11 but that I think was due to some shutter shake creeping in at ~1/200th shutter speeds, or perhaps my not letting the lens settle for long enough after changing the aperture on camera before firing the shutter with the cable release.


800px




450mm (+ sigma @ 500mm), another turret.






Sigma @ 500mm and DFA @ 450mm.

dfa 450mm
sigma 500mm

Distant Focus. The house in the crop on the Great Orme is about 3km away (sorry about the pole, best I could do from the driveway). Atmospherics can be the main limiter of IQ in these cases, but this was a favourable, still, clear frosty morning. Neither lens managed to resolve the car number plates! The sigma pics at 500mm highlight a drop off in iq from 440mm. IQ was again good across the frame with no particularly significant falloff visible with either lens in this case.

















Bird Focus. I did look at the possibility of acquiring a taxidermy specimen for authenticity but good ones are a fair wack, so I picked the kingfisher ornament up for 99p and the owl for a bit more. This portmanteau was set up at a distance of just over 5m, this was just right for frame coverage with both lenses (the kingfisher ornament is 16.2cm high). Note that the sigma at 500mm has no advantage over the D FA at 450mm due to focus breathing. If you think you might go with the sigma because you get a bit more at 500mm, well at this range, you don't!
Light was so so, clag over the hills blocking the low sun, but I was ok with that as an opportunity to look for fringing. I had to do a fair bit of spot removal on these pics, and tweaking of exposure + a bit of fill light. Two crops. Not much to choose between them on the crop of the kingfisher head apart from the higher level of fringing of the sigma (curiously the fringing gets worse as the f stop increases. A trick of the light perhaps, although I have another lens that does that - the Canon FD 400mm f4.5). The fine detail of the owl fluff is slightly but distinctly clearer with the D FA (less so actually when comparing the whole pics side by side in fastroom).


















Close focus. The DFA focuses to 2m, the Sigma to 2.3m. Focus distance here was approx 2.5m. It was immediately noticeable that the sigma focus breathes much more than the DFA. I aimed to cover the width of the banknote. The sigma was at 440mm, the DFA at 330mm (though I didn't exactly equalise the field of view, the DFA is a bit wider). My first efforts were sub standard - shutter shake influencing results with both lenses. I didn't use any extra lighting, just the sunlight filtering into the conservatory, so shutter speeds were sub 1/100th. Corrected second go using mirror lock-up and higher (400) ASA. These test pics most clearly distinguished between the lenses, the DFA distinctly better.








Last edited by marcusBMG; 02-01-2020 at 10:08 AM.
12-03-2019, 02:35 PM   #2
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
sergysergy's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,708
thanks for the comparison. I bet it will be very useful for many users.
12-03-2019, 03:23 PM   #3
Pentaxian
ChipB's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Austin, TX area
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,306
A lot of time and effort went into this - thanks much for the comparison!
12-03-2019, 03:30 PM   #4
Pentaxian
Paul the Sunman's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,452
This is consistent with my comparisons (not nearly as extensive as yours) of the Sigma 50-500 with the DFA 150-450. The DFA is slightly sharper with better contrast throughout, but the Sigma is a fine lens at a much cheaper price.

12-03-2019, 03:32 PM   #5
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 222
Well done! The DFA seems more contrasty throughout, and has the edge in sharpness, particularly in the close-up photos.
12-03-2019, 04:38 PM   #6
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
danielblues's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cascais, Portugal
Posts: 166
Thank you for this, it confirms my experience, the sigma is better near 150 then 500mm, but still good value.
12-03-2019, 05:51 PM   #7
mlt
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 680
Thank you for the in depth comparison, great work.
12-03-2019, 06:13 PM   #8
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: midwest, United States
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,284
Thanks for this very informative post. It took a lot of work to do this. I agree with others here, the Pentax is slighly sharper and definetly more contrasty. Since you've handled both lens was one easier to use in any way or have bonus convenience features that are worthwhile?

Thanks,
barondla

12-03-2019, 06:41 PM   #9
Urs
Pentaxian
Urs's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Panama
Posts: 679
Thanks for your effort and for sharing this with us!
12-03-2019, 07:49 PM   #10
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
kiwi_jono's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,968
Thanks for doing a very nice comparison!
12-03-2019, 08:53 PM   #11
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: New York
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 938
Nice comparison. I have a 50-500 and it's a decent little (ok, not little) lens but from what I see from the DFA, the DFA blows it completely out of the water. I'd actually love to know how the DFA compares to Sigma's 150-600's and 60-600 in the corresponding focal lengths. I know these three lenses aren't available in K mount but it's a comparison that I'm really curious about.
12-03-2019, 09:12 PM   #12
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
swip's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,793
A nice piece of work. Thank you for posting.
12-03-2019, 09:16 PM   #13
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Snapppy's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Photos: Albums
Posts: 365
QuoteOriginally posted by marcusBMG Quote
There are already some threads discussing how "bigma's" compare to the DFA 150-450mm:

Since I have the DFA 150-450mm and have just acquired a non-OS example of the Sigma DG 150-500mm APO HSM I have been able to take comparison images at different focal lengths.
Interesting test, thanks for the effort. The stone wall was a good subject for this
12-03-2019, 09:59 PM - 1 Like   #14
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 706
I just wanted to commend the author to put this all together and that you might want to submit to the admins as an article for the front page.
12-04-2019, 12:34 AM   #15
F/8 & Somewhere
Loyal Site Supporter
TedH42's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Colorado
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,363
Thanks for putting the work into making a very informative and useful post.

Both lenses are quite competent, but the DFA clearly edges the Sigma, which performs rather competively until the closeups.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
450mm, 500mm, dfa, focus, iq, k-mount, lenses, pentax, pentax lens, shutter, sigma, slr lens, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sigma 150-500 f5-6,3 APO DG HSM II on K-1 II issue. hansbeus Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 5 09-20-2019 05:02 AM
For Sale - Sold: Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM for PENTAX 150-500 transam879 Sold Items 3 03-24-2014 05:02 AM
Sigma - 70-200/2.8 EX DG OS APO HSM IF **** VS ****70-200/2.8 EX DG II APO Macro HSM lightningthief Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 13 10-19-2012 01:46 AM
For Sale - Sold: Sigma 150-500mm APO DG HSM F5-6.3...friend of Bigma 50-500mm Edgar_in_Indy Sold Items 3 06-17-2012 04:13 PM
Wanted - Acquired: Sigma 150-500mm HSM, 150mm MACRO HSM, Sigma 18-250 HSM, Sigma 10-20mm HSM mackloon Sold Items 7 05-01-2011 02:25 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:41 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top