Is old glass really that good on DSLR

Wheatfield · 03-19-2020, 09:50 AM

Originally posted by luftfluss

Oftentimes "good enough" is good enough until you experience better.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^this^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

**stevebrot** · 03-19-2020, 11:57 AM - **1 Like**

FWIW, I did "good" to "very good" work with a Rexatar 50/1.8* for about a decade. It was not a good lens, by most definitions, except for the fact that I had nothing else in the bag and was dirt poor and was generally happy with the results.

Would I shoot the Rexatar now, on any of my cameras? Ummm...no. Ironically, I now own the Auto Rikenon 50/1.7 that should have come with the camera and have no problem shooting with it on my K-3. It is well up to the challenge of that sensor. Is the Rikenon the equal of my DA 50/1.8 on APS-C? In short...yes, and I like it better for most subjects. How about FF? Good question. I have not shot with it on film for a long time, though I suspect any of my Pentax/Ashahi fast 50s are probably better.

Steve

* Victim of mail-order bait and switch and no money at the time to up-ante to the lens I thought I had paid for.

**iheiramo** · 03-19-2020, 01:33 PM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by luftfluss

Oftentimes "good enough" is good enough until you experience better.

That's why I have a rule; If I can't afford it, I don't try it

**Fluegel** · 03-20-2020, 08:13 AM - **1 Like**

Comparing IQ based on internet flies not to mention strongly reduced files is totally useless.

I posted a strongly reduced file from an 80 Mp medium format image and received comment from users they could do better with a Pentax macro lens.
That is interesting: beating an image recorded with a Zeiss 38 mm Biogon lens with a macro lens even if that lens is a Pentax lens.

I avoid these discussions, they are a waste of time.

---------- Post added 03-20-20 at 08:29 AM ----------

Originally posted by iheiramo

That's why I have a rule; If I can't afford it, I don't try it

I understand you, that is a realistic point of view.

Still you miss the excitement that items out of reach can give.
Somebody at a camera fair asked me if he could take a look through the viewfinder of a MF camera with an expensive WA lens mounted.

The guy was familiar with the camera. I took a flim back loaded the back with 800 ISO Kodak film and asked him to take a couple of shots.
I gave him the roll film. He send me a couple of scans that looked great. This not only made his day but mine as well.

You do not have to own it to enjoy it.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Canon shifting their focus on intoducing mirrorless glass rather than DSLR glass	lesmore49	Non-Pentax Cameras: Canon, Nikon, etc.	26	01-16-2020 09:21 AM
PENTAX new glass-old glass - lens tubes designed like old glass? corporate identity?	camyum	Pentax Full Frame	3	09-24-2017 02:52 PM
New glass - old glass. Which lenses should Pentax revisit?	HopelessTogger	Pentax Full Frame	204	09-07-2017 05:12 AM
D800 - But you’d better have some really good glass in front of it.	interested_observer	Non-Pentax Cameras: Canon, Nikon, etc.	47	02-04-2014 11:35 AM
Autumn colors - old glass is a good glass	andrei46	Post Your Photos!	5	10-26-2007 09:35 AM

03-19-2020, 09:50 AM	#136
Wheatfield Pentaxian Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: The wheatfields of Canada Posts: 12,599	Originally posted by luftfluss Oftentimes "good enough" is good enough until you experience better. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^this^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

03-19-2020, 11:57 AM - 1 Like	#137
stevebrot Otis Memorial Pentaxian Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver (USA) Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 39,136	FWIW, I did "good" to "very good" work with a Rexatar 50/1.8* for about a decade. It was not a good lens, by most definitions, except for the fact that I had nothing else in the bag and was dirt poor and was generally happy with the results. Would I shoot the Rexatar now, on any of my cameras? Ummm...no. Ironically, I now own the Auto Rikenon 50/1.7 that should have come with the camera and have no problem shooting with it on my K-3. It is well up to the challenge of that sensor. Is the Rikenon the equal of my DA 50/1.8 on APS-C? In short...yes, and I like it better for most subjects. How about FF? Good question. I have not shot with it on film for a long time, though I suspect any of my Pentax/Ashahi fast 50s are probably better. Steve * Victim of mail-order bait and switch and no money at the time to up-ante to the lens I thought I had paid for.

03-19-2020, 01:33 PM - 1 Like	#138
iheiramo Unoriginal Poster Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: Espoo Photos: Albums Posts: 2,025	Originally posted by luftfluss Oftentimes "good enough" is good enough until you experience better. That's why I have a rule; If I can't afford it, I don't try it

03-20-2020, 08:13 AM - 1 Like	#139
Fluegel Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2017 Photos: Gallery Posts: 425	Comparing IQ based on internet flies not to mention strongly reduced files is totally useless. I posted a strongly reduced file from an 80 Mp medium format image and received comment from users they could do better with a Pentax macro lens. That is interesting: beating an image recorded with a Zeiss 38 mm Biogon lens with a macro lens even if that lens is a Pentax lens. I avoid these discussions, they are a waste of time. ---------- Post added 03-20-20 at 08:29 AM ---------- Originally posted by iheiramo That's why I have a rule; If I can't afford it, I don't try it I understand you, that is a realistic point of view. Still you miss the excitement that items out of reach can give. Somebody at a camera fair asked me if he could take a look through the viewfinder of a MF camera with an expensive WA lens mounted. The guy was familiar with the camera. I took a flim back loaded the back with 800 ISO Kodak film and asked him to take a couple of shots. I gave him the roll film. He send me a couple of scans that looked great. This not only made his day but mine as well. You do not have to own it to enjoy it.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
	Search this Thread: Advanced Search