.
As some may know, my K20D + Tamron 70-200 went in the lake on an un-braked
stroller. (usual stroller resident was helping me feed the ducks, only equipment
was dunked.)
Anyway, the internal condensation was finally gone today - the fog has cleared.
It left a very slight film on the elements, and a whole lot of very visible water spots -
on both sides of every internal element, from what I could see. Think the worst
fungus you've ever seen, times two.
Anyway, decided to throw it on the K100D (K20D is fried) and see what the images
looked like.
Surprisingly, the AF wasn't affected at all - in fact, its the first time I had it on
the K100D, and I was suprised to find that it actually locked to focus faster than
my SDM 50-135 does on the K100D. So that's good, mechanicals came out OK.
Here are some images showing how the optics were affected by the water spots:
Nothing much in these first two, contrast is a little less, but my default jpegs on
the K100D are like that anyway compared to the K20d:
In this one, you can see some water spots in the bokeh: Here too - note that these are f2.8 200mm, so very thin DOF, the softness
is normal for the settings - lots of normal OOF: This looks normal: Just slightly less contrast, but again, that may be the K100D vs. K20D default
settings: Heres a tight crop where you can see some slight ghosting that wasn't
there before: Little bit of softness/ghosting here too, but all detail is retained: Here's where it's really apparent, though - shooting almost right into the sun
would clip before, now it washes out in light-blue/purple flare: But overall, I was impressed with the IQ that's left.
I called Tamron service, and the first thing the guy asked me was: "fresh water
or salt water?" Turns out it might be completely salvageable with just a good
cleaning, elements and gaskets, so I sent it to them today for an estimate.
It would be nice to have a perfect lens again for, say, $200-300 vs. $700.
I've got my fingers crossed.
.