Originally posted by stevebrot Out of curiosity, what difference are you looking for on the KP (the model with the most recent sensor design) vs the K-1/K-1II (2015 technology) or K-70 (2013 technology)?
Steve
maybe my phrasing could have been clearer: since all the examples and reviews I have found here are with 16MP cameras, I wanted some feedback - and see examples - from users who have used this lens with K1, K70 and KP.
Before the KP I owned a K3 and I have noticed that my pre-digital lenses now that I use them with the KP are more likely to fail me in extreme light conditions: hard lights, backlit scenes, light reflecting surfaces - so I have become extremely cautious when it comes to add pre-digital lenses to my arsenal, my assumption being that this change in behavior is due to the 24MP sensor.
Originally posted by mikesbike I have the KP and use the DA* 50-135mm f/2.8 and the DA* 200mm f/2.8 instead of a 70-200mm zoom lens. Half the weight or less when handling or carrying on-camera, and more zoom range as well, being able to get down to 50mm. Matches better with my Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 lens.
I find the DA* 50-135mm is adequate for most of my fast tele zoom needs (similar to a 70-200mm on a FF body), then if I need a fast telephoto beyond that, I'll go to my DA* 200mm. In both cases I'll be handling a more modest-size/weight ensemble.
though I prefer primes, it looks like an interesting solution