Originally posted by mikesbike Not only that, as to16mm from the DA 16-85mm, for subjects having linear features where linear distortion is of concern (buildings, or parts of buildings in the frame, interiors, street light poles, cityscapes, etc.) the distortion will be quite high, where the Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 will present very low to nil distortion from about 12mm, and has constant aperture design for good low light capability at all its focal lengths.
Now that you mention it, it is a very good point, often overlooked. The Sigma 10-20 is distortion free starting with 14mm if I remember correctly, whereas when I spin around my 16-85 at 16mm in the viewfinder I clearly see the distortion. Time to undust my 10-20.