Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 1 Like Search this Thread
08-02-2021, 04:29 PM   #1
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
chuck1955's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 35
Pentax-DA*300 SDM fail

I got out my 300 mm f4 to try it out with my new K1ii, and darned if the autofocus is dead. I hadn't used the lens in awhile, but it had been fine the last time I did. I have not come up with any threads on this in a search of the forums. Is failure of the SDM motor a frequent fault on this lens that anyone knows of? I have had a copy of the infamous DA 16-50 SDM for years, known for this failure, with never a problem. I love the 300, and I guess I will be sending it in for repairs. Other lenses work fine on the K1ii, and the 300 does not work on another body, and the terminals are clean, and yes, the switch is on AF. There is no clamp on the lens that I can find. ARRGGGHHH!

08-02-2021, 04:33 PM   #2
Pentaxian




Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 6,029
Haven't I heard about some of these SDM lenses needing to wake-up or go through some sort of "jump start" procedure if they haven't been used in some time?
08-02-2021, 05:33 PM   #3
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
ramseybuckeye's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hampstead, NC
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 17,294
QuoteOriginally posted by vonBaloney Quote
Haven't I heard about some of these SDM lenses needing to wake-up or go through some sort of "jump start" procedure if they haven't been used in some time?
I've read that also, I wouldn't give up yet.
08-02-2021, 05:55 PM   #4
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,154
QuoteOriginally posted by chuck1955 Quote
I got out my 300 mm f4 to try it out with my new K1ii, and darned if the autofocus is dead. I hadn't used the lens in awhile, but it had been fine the last time I did. ARRGGGHHH!
Curious.
When you mention the lens was not used for some time.
How long was it it wasn't used?

A stretch of 3-4 months?
Or more towards 5-6 months?
Or what might it be?

08-02-2021, 06:20 PM   #5
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
chuck1955's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 35
Original Poster
A year at least - too much work, not enough photography.
08-02-2021, 06:22 PM   #6
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Washington Cascades
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 12,991
The 300mm is not one that is often mentioned as having SDM problems. Doesn't mean it can't fail though.

Try leaving it connected to the camera overnight. Some people have reported that can help.

You got me worried though as I don't think my DA 300 has been used in over a year. Just put it on and tested and the lens works just fine.
08-02-2021, 06:24 PM   #7
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 233
I had the SDM fail on my 60-250, and sent it for repair, it was 8 or 9 years old and I wonder about failing lube, failing sealing rings overstressing the motor.. I was told by the distributor who did the repair that the motor was a new improved version.

I suggest you ask the same question when/if you send it in, it might be the same motor as in the 60-250 in which case you would have the new one put in (presumably), but it might be different too. Hopefully the replacements are going to give better service,

08-02-2021, 06:26 PM   #8
Pentaxian




Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 6,029
A little googling and I found a suggestion to use Live View and keep trying to get it to focus -- turn the ring manually as well between attempts (with AF turned on).
08-02-2021, 06:34 PM - 1 Like   #9
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
chuck1955's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 35
Original Poster
Success

OK, I searched "jump start for SDM" and got a thread from this forum, suggesting holding down the AF button for a few seconds, plus turning focus ring back and forth a few times, and it worked. All good now.

One thing mentioned in that thread is storing lenses vertically rather than on their sides. My shorter lenses are mainly vertical, but I must admit the teles are on their sides. I will give it a try, (and make sure I use it more), but is that anything anyone has strong feelings about?

Thanks,

Chuck
08-02-2021, 06:49 PM   #10
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Washington Cascades
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 12,991
QuoteOriginally posted by chuck1955 Quote
but is that anything anyone has strong feelings about?
Over the years there have been numerous 'solutions' to SDM issues. Leaving the lens on the camera to 'charge' it, using it frequently, turning the focus ring in some manner, etc, etc. As far as I know none of those methods have worked in all cases. So take them with a grain of salt. If it works for you, great, but I do not think there is any universal cure.
08-02-2021, 07:14 PM   #11
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 28,446
QuoteOriginally posted by jatrax Quote
Over the years there have been numerous 'solutions' to SDM issues. Leaving the lens on the camera to 'charge' it, using it frequently, turning the focus ring in some manner, etc, etc. As far as I know none of those methods have worked in all cases. So take them with a grain of salt. If it works for you, great, but I do not think there is any universal cure.
Amen.

Also screwdrive conversion is an option. Not with the 60-250 but the da* 300 is easily converted.

The 300 and 200 are the lenses I convert the least as they seem the least failure prone.
08-02-2021, 07:55 PM   #12
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,154
is good to know you managed to "wake it up".

Indeed.
I make it a point to use the DA300 at least once every 3-4 months.

Main thing is, just to ensure it doesnt get left unused for longer than 3-4 months.

So, sometimes i just mount it on the camera and then just make sure the AF motor move, even if am not shooting anything.
08-03-2021, 05:59 PM   #13
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 233
I had problems with my 17-70, after the motor was first replaced I had a diary entry every two months to exercise the lens. I started getting problems anyway after maybe a couple of years or so, and the tricks about repeated focus attempts helped but did not stave off worsening. Sadly, it disappeared en-route for a second repair, so we'll never know whether it was the second SDM motor that was the problem, but I have my suspicions. The 60-250 was getting worse, I can't remember if it failed completely, or it was just so bad at the last event I used it at that I just switched to manual focus and then sent it off for repair. The 'kiss of life' tricks didn't work nearly as well on it as on the 17-70.
10-15-2023, 02:33 PM   #14
Junior Member
SteveEveritt's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 36
This is simply lack of use, the capacitor has drained and needs a recharge. Put it on your camera, press and hold the AF button and after a while it will burst back to life, I do it regularly with my DA*55 and have in the past with both the DA*16-50 and DA*50-135. Not an issue and certainly not worth butchering a perfectly good lens over.
10-15-2023, 05:17 PM   #15
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 28,446
QuoteOriginally posted by SteveEveritt Quote
This is simply lack of use, the capacitor has drained and needs a recharge. Put it on your camera, press and hold the AF button and after a while it will burst back to life, I do it regularly with my DA*55 and have in the past with both the DA*16-50 and DA*50-135. Not an issue and certainly not worth butchering a perfectly good lens over.
Only some lenses respond this way. Many fail and won’t wake up. The likely issue is stiction not a capacitor based on what is known btw.

Also what do you mean about butchering?
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
failure, k-mount, k1ii, lens, pentax lens, pentax-da* 300mm sdm fail, pentax-da*300 sdm, sdm, slr lens

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
645D, K-m2 and NEW LENSES DA*10-16/4 SDM, DA*20/2 SDM, DA*28/2 SDM ogl Pentax News and Rumors 165 08-11-2010 03:26 AM
Pentax DA* 60-250 SDM Fail. SN 9224360 Clinton Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 1 06-24-2010 06:41 PM
Macro FAIL!! Not Epic, but FAIL... icywarm Photo Critique 3 04-28-2010 05:51 AM
Which lenses are known to SDM fail? axl Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 23 01-31-2010 02:06 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:12 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top