Originally posted by axl not bad way of thinking Heather, I have 40 and sigma 105 as part of my standard kit. But since I don't have any decent prime wider than 40 I'm "forced" to use Sigma 10-20 on the wide end (it's usually stuck @ 10mm so there is a huge gap to 40, even from 20 that is...)
BR
I did finally pull the trigger on the longer macro, but I wound up getting the DFA100 instead. After looking at some sample images on pbase of both the Sigma and the Pentax, I decided that I liked the IQ on the Pentax better than the Sigma. I should be getting it on Friday.
What made me start reconsider getting the DA21 (I've been thinking about it off and on for about a year now) was this last trip to Tennessee I went on week before least. The rest of the family and I made a trek to a state park where there is a beautiful old bridge that was begging my camera for some attention. I had the 35 and the 55-300 with me, the 35 being fine for pics of the bridge from further away, but too long for some of the closer shots I wanted to get. I made the 35 do, but I really wanted wider.
If I was hiking or otherwise traveling and didn't need macro, I figure that the 21 + 55-300 would make a good lightweight combo. If I need macro, I could either go with the all-prime kit (21, 43, & 100) or 16-45 + 100. To give the 100 a little more length, I could simply add my TC to the 100.
Heather