Originally posted by victordeamorin Congratulations! You might be the first PF member to acutally receive it and use it
Looks like a beautiful lens... even though you managed to get some CA in the grass under the most extreme conditions in that 2nd shot!
If you can see CA in an image that much reduced in size that's a serious issue. But I have no clue what you're talking about so, maybe I'll just beg to differ. All lenses have some CA...so even if you're right, (which I again dispute that that would be something worth mentioning) the judgement needs to be qualified. Are you saying, the kind of CA all lenses produce, or something that needs to be mentioned as being out of the ordinary? The normal judgement for CA is if it's less than .7 pixel it's acceptable.
The CA chart for the D FA* 501.4, one of the absolute best.
No one to date has argued that the fact that the lens produces some CA is an issue. And in fact, the Pentax engineers tested varying amounts of CA to see which produced the most acceptable out of focus renditions judged by human eyes, not charts. One can assume from what was posted , that they could have had less CA, but that would have diminished the rendering of out of focus areas.
So we don't need to know there's CA, every lens produces some. We need an evaluation. The out of focus areas in the bottom photo look fantastic as does the detail in the image. I'd say they nailed the CA vs out of focus rendition vs MTF perfectly. Those out of focus areas are perfect.