Originally posted by BBear Hey guys,
all Alfist is saying is, try the FA 35/2 in a store at the same time, and if you have your mind open to really judge the results, you could possibly discover that the 35/2 delivers a very damn close result.
But, of course, it seems like the lower price tag and the looks of the lens already created some bad image of it for you, very unfortunate...
I get what he's saying, and he admits it is somewhat "agricultural." Sometimes close isn't enough. For me build quality and the feel of the lens is a significant part of the equation. It isn't about price, it is about "quality" (whatever that means) and the whole user experience. There is more to taking pictures than just iq of the glass or sensor specs. It is a process that is influenced by a lot of factors.
On a semi-related note I picked up a 43ltd tonight. Good gawd, amazing lens. On par with my 77ltd, and certainly a step above the 35ltd as a "walkaround" lens at least in my hands so far. There is something different about the way the FA ltds seem to work the light. And it certainly just feels right in my hand. I might have to try a 31ltd again and see.
Different strokes for different folks. Value is in the eye of the beholder. But i'd rather have a handful of *really* special lenses than a whole bunch of "good value" glass.