Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-15-2008, 05:44 PM   #46
Pentaxian
Ratmagiclady's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: GA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 13,464
Definitely a prime for me, ....specifically a fast 85 or digital equivalent, most of the time, enough that I was going to start off my digital gear with the 50 1.4 as first and only.

I do expect that the digital may be doing a lot more of the zoom-lensey *jobs,* though: these rarely come out with film.

12-15-2008, 06:06 PM   #47
Veteran Member




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Melb. Aust
Posts: 841
QuoteOriginally posted by nostatic Quote
the only people that might be confused are *very* old school people who haven't been on the interwebs before.
exactly!!!! (extra exclaimation marks due to minimal msg length requirements!!!!)
12-15-2008, 07:33 PM   #48
Pentaxian
Marc Sabatella's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 10,686
QuoteOriginally posted by ChrisPlatt Quote
Perhaps most of the discussions of this matter took place before you were old enough to read.
Could be, but in case you hadn't noticed, language evolves. The use of "prime" to mean "fixed focal length" may have been controversial 50 years ago, but it's completely standard accepted practice now. Might as well complain that "internet" isn't a word because that your 50-year old dictionary doesn't mention it.
12-15-2008, 07:57 PM   #49
Inactive Account




Join Date: Mar 2007
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,675
I don't find it particularly irksome to use the phrase 'prime lens' when speaking of lenses of fixed focal length; and I am an old fart!

I've aquired quite a few zoom lens over the years and do use them but I find more joy in using manual focus prime lenses. I fiddle around too much trying to get the proper focal length with zooms rather than just taking a picture.

12-15-2008, 08:34 PM   #50
Site Supporter
SpecialK's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: So California
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 14,433
QuoteOriginally posted by Syb Quote
What is the difference?
Syllables.
09-15-2009, 08:18 AM   #51
Forum Member




Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 84
QuoteOriginally posted by avian Quote
My entire history basically revolves around two cameras. K1000 in the film days that I've used since being a teen. And the K20D.

On the K1000 I had the choice of cheap primes and cheap zooms, I always chose the primes. The resulting photos spoke for themselves, the pop and colours were fantastic.

On the K20D the DA* 16-50 just boggles my mind, I still want to get some decent primes, the voigt 58 and da35 macro, and I might turn into a prime shooter again - if anything for the size factor. But at the moment I just feel its no rush. If anything I wouldnt mind a long prime first as I dont have as much confidence with the 50-135 as I'd like to have.
The 50-135 is much more reliable than the 16-50mm, IMO. A lot of 16-50mm copies suffer from chromatic issues, etc.
09-15-2009, 08:23 AM   #52
Banned




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Savannah, U.S./Baguio City, P.H.
Posts: 5,979
im a "prime", without a doubt. more specifically I am a 55mm.
09-15-2009, 08:30 AM   #53
Site Supporter
Rense's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Zetten - The Netherlands
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,812
QuoteOriginally posted by séamuis Quote
im a "prime", without a doubt. more specifically I am a 55mm.
You mean a 55mmF1.8, I suppose?

Primes for me. Manual primes. I see the value of AF and of zoom, but somehow I just love to use MF fixed focal length lenses. And I'm torn between three loves: M42 Russians vs. Takumars vs. Pentax-A. Can't choose, can only make more photos. HELP...

09-15-2009, 08:43 AM   #54
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Prince George, BC Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 644
I use zooms for event photography but when shooting landscapes, macro/close up etc., that invariabley employ a tripod, I prefer primes. However, since I have the 16-50 and 50-135 and no primes in those focal lengths, I would use them regardless if the required lens fell within that focal range. I really think zoom lenses are the only way to go for events/weddings etc., and the range from 16 -135 covers that ...hence my preference for zooms in that range.

ps: I am currently selling off some old gear to fund the purchase of a DA* 55 f1.4 that will get a lot of use for portrait and available light work at events/weddings.
09-15-2009, 08:46 AM   #55
Banned




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Savannah, U.S./Baguio City, P.H.
Posts: 5,979
QuoteQuote:
You mean a 55mmF1.8, I suppose?
oh my, yes. the 1.8 55mm indeed.
09-15-2009, 08:48 AM   #56
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brooklyn
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 316
I'm a prime.

Zoom's one more thing to think about.
09-15-2009, 01:01 PM   #57
Veteran Member
Fixcinater's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 409
I'm a zoom when I'm working (except for sports), a prime when I'm shooting for myself or walking around.
09-15-2009, 01:21 PM   #58
Inactive Account




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: West Sussex UK
Posts: 235
I started with zooms, but since I got the DA*300 I have seen the way forward.

Next in my sights - the DFA 100 macro.
09-15-2009, 01:54 PM   #59
Veteran Member
yeatzee's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Temecula
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,675
Prime.... no question about it. Sadly though I cannot afford any telephoto primes atm (really envying that DA*300mm) so on the long end I only have my 55-300mm (great lens, but just not the same as using a prime).

specifically im a 105mm.....
09-15-2009, 03:14 PM   #60
Veteran Member
raymeedc's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 951
QuoteOriginally posted by séamuis Quote
im a "prime", without a doubt. more specifically I am a 55mm.
Ditto. Whenever I go on "one lens shooting" excursions (which is more often than not, as I like traveling light & uncomplicated) I almost invariably have one of my Takumar 55s mounted.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
k-mount, pentax lens, primes, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
prime vs. zoom a_brooke2006 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 23 10-23-2010 01:59 PM
limited prime vs zoom trevorgrout Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 18 06-04-2010 01:01 PM
New Lens: Prime or Zoom? Rafalas Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 01-18-2010 09:14 AM
Prime vs. Zoom magnum1 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 15 11-25-2008 05:12 AM
Zoom v. Prime stafford588 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 9 01-14-2008 04:10 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:18 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top