Originally posted by ryan s FA31 for me too (although I can't afford one yet). A 24-35 is just perfect for me.
So the answer to the original question is: FA 31
I don't have a FA 31mm and HAVE NOT shot one
, although I have shot ALL the other limiteds, and FA lenses in the 21-35mm range, so unless the 31mm is truly magic in some way
... based on the test, the FA 31 seems like a great lens on film, and a very good lens on digital.
For the money, the FA 35 is simply a better lens (half the price brand new vs. a used FA 31).
The 31mm is slightly faster, but not any sharper wide open.
The 31mm seems to suffer more fringing/CA.
The 31mm is bigger.
The 31mm is better built (but at 3X the price new, and 2X the price used in a bad economy!!).
The 31mm is a bit better FL on digital at 47mm vs. 52mm.
So now the question is, will the 30mm DA be faster, smaller and reduce the flaws of the FA31mm? If so will it sell for less than the used FA 31mm?
Or, am I just trying to spread enough doubt to lower the price of the 31mm Limited? (answer, I do want a 31mm Limited, but more for film use, and since I shoot not much film these days, I'd have to say there is very little chance of me buying one in the short term, coupled with the weather sealed DA* 30mm on the road map even less chance, so the answer is NO!...the 15mm DA is the next lens on the radar).
BTW, how do you like the SMC-A 24-50? I got it last year off this board, and finally have begun really using it the last few weekends. Not too many photos but along with a few shots from last year, I really like it. It's again, a better lens on film, but a 24-50 paired with the 21mm and a 70/77/90/135mm (depending on your preference on the long end) make for a nice 3 lens kit!