Long tele for birding and wildlife

btnapa · 11-02-2022, 05:55 AM

Originally posted by deanklim

I've gotten some incredible photos with the lens

The images are very sharp. Great job. What body did you use?

**luftfluss** · 11-02-2022, 07:18 AM

Originally posted by Lowell Goudge

The sensor resolution here is the difference but the question really in this comparison is, does the A400+1.4 rear converter on a k5 IIdeliver more detail than the A400 alone on a K3II and does the K5II sensor low light performance outweigh the need to run higher ISO when using the A400 + 1.4x compared to the A400 alone on the K3II

Since i sold my K-5 II to fund the K-3 II, I didn't have a chance to test the various combinations of gear directly.

IME, there comes a point where if you have to raise the ISO too high to accommodate the use of a TC, you lose the advantages of greater detail capture.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
K-1 for wildlife / birding ?	christiandre	Pentax K-1 & K-1 II	108	11-29-2019 08:22 PM
Nature Birding with non birding lens	kengoh	Post Your Photos!	14	03-17-2018 11:42 PM
300mm Prime on the Pentax KP for Wildlife and Birding???	Gold Coast	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	13	06-21-2017 02:01 AM
Recommended Lens For Birding & Wildlife?	seachunk2	Troubleshooting and Beginner Help	55	07-22-2011 05:35 AM
Lens for birding/wildlife	OrenMc	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	111	06-01-2008 07:15 PM

11-02-2022, 05:55 AM	#31
btnapa Pentaxian Join Date: Oct 2013 Posts: 1,615	Originally posted by deanklim I've gotten some incredible photos with the lens The images are very sharp. Great job. What body did you use?

11-02-2022, 07:18 AM	#32
luftfluss Site Supporter Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: NJ Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 11,619	Originally posted by Lowell Goudge The sensor resolution here is the difference but the question really in this comparison is, does the A400+1.4 rear converter on a k5 IIdeliver more detail than the A400 alone on a K3II and does the K5II sensor low light performance outweigh the need to run higher ISO when using the A400 + 1.4x compared to the A400 alone on the K3II Since i sold my K-5 II to fund the K-3 II, I didn't have a chance to test the various combinations of gear directly. IME, there comes a point where if you have to raise the ISO too high to accommodate the use of a TC, you lose the advantages of greater detail capture.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
	Search this Thread: Advanced Search