Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-28-2008, 12:45 PM   #16
Moderator PEG Judges
Kerrowdown's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Highlands of Scotland.
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 32,682
Aye, as others have said, set it for 50.

12-30-2008, 03:23 PM   #17
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 429
QuoteOriginally posted by woof Quote
Jamie, you are 100% correct. Even for an inexpensive lens it is no slouch.

M 50/2

Check the above link to see if yours is one of the later types. If so it may have a little collector value as a bonus.

woof
Well, you learn something new everyday so thanks for this information. The M50/2 that came with my K1000 in January 1987 appears to be one of the late lenses with a serial number of 8717961. It's been known to produce a decent photo now and then.
12-31-2008, 08:51 AM   #18
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 429
Two points related to the original post:

1) When I shoot a lens on my A1.4x-S tele-converter I do factor the lens focal length for SR by 1.4x. Yep, common sense. For my 135mm on the converter, I set the SR to 200mm and I get good results. A unique combo telephoto is my 50/1.4 Super Tak on the TC with SR set to 75mm.

2) If you use the reciprocal of your lens focal length for your minimum shutter speed for hand-held shooting I believe you should "crop-factor" that speed. For that 50mm I'd use 1/75th minimum for hand-held. The old reciprocal rule of thumb was borderline effective before SR.
12-31-2008, 07:31 PM   #19
Veteran Member
alohadave's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Quincy, MA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,024
QuoteOriginally posted by Marc Sabatella Quote
For me, it's useful in communicating people who have experience with 35mm film but not with APS-C / digital. I have only very limited experiencing actually *using* a 50mm lens on film, but I understand the crop factor business, I have a pretty good what it would look like - it's a little narrower than my 28mm and a little wider than my 40mm. So when film people talk about using a 50mm lens on their film cameras, I have some idea what they are talking about.
The equivalency is much more useful for P&S and superzoom cameras where the sensor is much smaller. On my Fuji S5200, the sensor has an approximate 6x crop factor, so using 36-360mm Eq is useful, compared to the actual 3.6-36mm focal length of the lens.

Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
50mm, k-mount, lens, pentax lens, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Silly Question straightshooter Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 32 06-17-2010 11:52 AM
I know this probably a silly question photolady95 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 10-03-2009 07:42 PM
Probably a silly question marius Photographic Technique 5 09-08-2008 11:36 PM
Silly question, but I have to ask... Buddha Jones Pentax Film SLR Discussion 5 11-28-2007 11:47 AM
Maybe a silly question... Avantphoto Photographic Technique 5 05-23-2007 10:15 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:31 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top