Hello again,
Iīm really undecided on which one to get for portraits but also other general kind of shooting. Flowers, landscapes etc.. Donīt really know what is the best compromise.
I have the zeiss 25 f/2.8 and love it. I also have the Nikon 85 f/1.8 because of AF with kids and the Voigtlander 58 f/1.4 SII. Nevertheless I want one of the Zeiss. The 85 would serve me well in portraits but Iīm not sure on the investment since I already have the Voigtlander that seems to have a similar look of the Zeiss. The diference in focal range might not be enough to justify the zeiss but Iīm not sure about the real diferences between the voigtlander and the Zeiss 85.
Teoretically the 50 Makro is not suited for portraits but I have seen some wonderfull shots of people with it. Plus my main subject is my little girl which the sharpness would not be much of a problem. Of course if I would shoot (with the camera) my mother in law she would not be very happy to see how old she is getting

For other purposes the Makro shines and the fact that it isnīt 1:1 really presents itself as an advantage to me since I much prefer close-ups than true makros.
The price diference also isnīt s decising factor since the Makro is a little expensier but not too much.
Can you help me here?