I have purchased (not paid) a Pentax DA 17-70mm f/4 SDM from ProDigital2000.
After I read about some faulty SDM AF motors I have concerns...
What is the chance I get a faulty AF motor?
Is this a problem on Pentax lenses?
I will save about 170 USD if I buy from PD2000.
Here in Norway I'll get 5 years complaint rights if the product is meant to last longer than 5 years. I will be getting alot for those 170 USDs if there is a good chance the SDM AF motor will fail two years from now.
Should I buy the lens from PD2000 and save 170USD or buy it here in Norway?
Translated with google:
Quote: Complaint
If you purchase an item with the missing, the law gives you certain consumer rights. An item is deficient if it is not that you have agreed. By many purchases are not agreed on anything in particular with regard to product quality, etc. Then you have the consumer law requirements that the product has the same features and durability that similar things in the same price range. You may also claim that the product has the qualities and the quality that the seller has stated to you directly or through its marketing.
However, it is not a shortage if the error is caused by abnormal wear and tear or improper use - eg. that you have used it in violation of the manual, or that it has been subject to external influence - eg. lightning. Is there such reasons for the error, you usually do not claim that the seller cover your expenses for example. repair or replacement.
If the new TV set or your washing machine stops functioning three years after you bought it, the seller will usually pay repairs etc .... If there is doubt about the reason for the lack seller can not escape responsibility by claiming that the error is caused by wear and tear or abnormal use. There are sellers who must substantiate that the failure is due to circumstances you are responsible for. It will, in other words, say that if the sellers can not find the cause of the error must be the seller cover the repairs.
A part sellers reject claims with an assertion that some parts of the goods must be expected to have a shorter life. In a story on a video has the Supreme Court decided that the failure of the electronic components with long life that does not require general maintenance, you have requirements for free repair in the entire 5-year period. This principle applies also for the other products that in normal use has a long life. After consumer law, the seller also has a strict duty of disclosure that says he must disclose any relationship that you have reason to expect to have. This means that you have a right to information if it is part of the product that must be expected to have a shorter life, or who need special maintenance. If the seller has not given you this information (either directly, in manual or similar) will often be a shortage if it fails for good in the claim period.
Last edited by NorthPentax; 01-30-2009 at 12:49 PM.